Thanks for the replies. I've bounced off D a few times because it
didn't seem ready to risk a whole development. I should have mentioned
I'm trying this on Windows 7. I did suspect object formats were
incompatible but as you say would have expected a decent error message.
I also tried from the
On 20/08/2010 06:51, Kagamin wrote:
Bob Cowdery Wrote:
Now I've tried this with just D code and it writes the output and runs
so I know something works. Does anyone know where to look, is it
Code::Blocks, compiler, stupidity (probably).
On windows dmd uses ancient OMF object format, but gcc
I've typed this example program in, but it doesn't compile. I looked up
the The D programming language errata but it wasn't listed. I'm using
DMD v2.048.
/**
Date: Aug 20, 2010
This was copied from TDPL book pages 386 - 387
*/
module dynamicmethods;
import std.stdio;
import
On 20.08.2010 01:17, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
If you declare a nested function as static, it shouldn't be a delegate. Also,
I
don't believe that you need the semicolon after the function declaration.
- Jonathan m Davis
Thanks for all the answers. I guess I'll just declare the functions as
On 19.08.2010 22:07, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
And, looking in my codebase, here is what I'm using ;)
template Init(T...)
{
T Init;
}
It's so simple...
I think I found this before the bug report and then forgot about it and
copied an old version. I'll update the bug report
20.08.2010 13:00, Joel Christensen wrote:
There seem to be quite a few errors in this one:
/**
Date: Aug 20, 2010
This was copied from TDPL book pages 386 - 387
*/
module dynamicmethods;
import std.stdio;
import std.variant;
alias Variant delegate(Dynamic self, Variant[] args...)
Rory Mcguire wrote:
Are all string literals that have the same value initialized to the same
address?
void main() {
string same() {
return This;
}
assert(This is same());
assert(This is This);
}
Can this be relied upon?
Interesting thanks guys.
Was just curious about the speed
You mean Andrei?
P.S. anyone can edit the errata page. It has a history backup, so if someone
accidentally screws up something you can roll back to a previous version. If
you find something that needs to be added, go ahead and do it.
Btw., I haven't reached that page yet. :p
Stanislav Blinov
20.08.2010 15:49, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
You mean Andrei?
Nope :p
P.S. anyone can edit the errata page. It has a history backup, so if someone
accidentally screws up something you can roll back to a previous version. If
you find something that needs to be added, go ahead and do it.
Yeah, I
20.08.2010 1:04, Cody Rose wrote:
try using -L/IMPLIB:canto.lib
I'm trying to create a Windows DLL as described in the tutorial at
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dll.html. I got the basic example working
fine, but if I try to get more complicated, it doesn't work. Specifically, I'm
trying
A bit more playing and I see that it's assumed that C code is compiled
with dmc and then the D code can be compiled with dmd which will also
link in the obj left by dmc. It wasn't clear at all that to make things
work easily one needs to use both the C and D Digital Mars compilers.
Code::Blocks
On 20/08/2010 09:17, Bob Cowdery wrote:
I'm still concerned it's a bit too soon as a lot of things seem to be
either Windows or Linux (cmake says its only tested for *nix) but not
both and there is very little guidance on building. I really want to get
this working on Windows first. As D makes
Hi,
The following code compiles and outputs 1 = 1 as expected:
1 == 1 writeln(1 = 1);
However, the following code fails to compile (although it should not):
1 == 2 writeln(1 = 2);
The error is as follows:
Error: integral constant must be scalar type, not void
What I expect that the second
On Friday, August 20, 2010 13:06:11 div0 wrote:
On 20/08/2010 20:59, Ersin Er wrote:
Hi,
The following code compiles and outputs 1 = 1 as expected:
1 == 1 writeln(1 = 1);
However, the following code fails to compile (although it should not):
1 == 2 writeln(1 = 2);
The
== Quote from Ersin Er (ersin...@gmail.com)'s article
Hi,
The following code compiles and outputs 1 = 1 as expected:
1 == 1 writeln(1 = 1);
However, the following code fails to compile (although it should not):
1 == 2 writeln(1 = 2);
The error is as follows:
Error: integral constant must
On 20/08/2010 21:16, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It's legal according to TDPL. It seems to be intended to be used as a shorthand
for if. So, stuff like
condition writeln(my output);
are supposed to be perfectly legal as bizarre as that may seem. I don't believe
that it would be legal to do
On Friday, August 20, 2010 14:00:22 div0 wrote:
Then Andrei has taken leave of his senses and this is one situation
where DMD is corrent and TDPL is wrong.
Half arsed, moronic shortcuts like that belong in scripting languages
and shell environements, not serious programming languages.
Well,
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 00:00, div0 d...@sourceforge.net wrote:
On 20/08/2010 21:16, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It's legal according to TDPL. It seems to be intended to be used as a
shorthand
for if. So, stuff like
condition writeln(my output);
are supposed to be perfectly legal as
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 23:06, div0 d...@sourceforge.net wrote:
On 20/08/2010 20:59, Ersin Er wrote:
Hi,
The following code compiles and outputs 1 = 1 as expected:
1 == 1 writeln(1 = 1);
However, the following code fails to compile (although it should not):
1 == 2 writeln(1 = 2);
Jonathan M Davis:
Well, Andrei is definitely a fan of using D for small scripts, so arguments
that
something shouldn't be done because it's intended for scripting aren't going
to
fly with him. Personally, I find it a bit weird, but I don't really care. I
probably won't code that way,
On Friday, August 20, 2010 15:32:16 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Well, Andrei is definitely a fan of using D for small scripts, so
arguments that something shouldn't be done because it's intended for
scripting aren't going to fly with him. Personally, I find it a bit
weird, but I
Bernard Helyer:
Because DMD ignores invalid attributes, and almost never flags them as an
error (or even a warning!).
Vote this:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
Bye,
bearophile
22 matches
Mail list logo
