DSFML2 doesn't exist right now. So no doubt you'll have trouble to
compile it. I don't know what you are try to achieve, but definitively
not what you believe.
Note that my answer in the mentionned link give you all you need to use
SFML with D.
SFML2 is currently on a devellopement stage,
import std.container;
class T {
int i;
}
void main() {
auto array = Array!(T);
auto heap = BinaryHeap!(Array!(T), a.i b.i)(array);
}
After compiling:
dmd2/linux/bin32/../../src/phobos/std/container.d(1612): Error:
template std.conv.emplace(T) if (!is(T == class)) does not match
On 09/22/2011 04:17 AM, alex wrote:
Hi Y'all!! Just as a note, I am new to the news group, but slightly less
new to D =)
Back on topic:
I am unable to get multiple version specifications to work (from the
website)
sometihng like:
version (foo) {
version = bar;
version = baz;
}
version (bar)
DSFML2's dsss file is just a remnant from the old DSFML.
Also I don't really update DSFML2 anymore. A SWIG wrapper would be a
better idea but it's hard to make it use our custom system module instead
of wrapping the original one.
In general using dsss isn't advisable, since rebuild is
On 9/22/2011 1:10 PM, Cuauhtémoc Ledesma wrote:
First at all sorry for my english.
After trying to build derelict (using the command dsss net install
derelict) to get derelict.sfml, I figured that the problem maybe is
dsss, becouse every time I invoke it the output is as if I hadn't
written
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:09:08 -0400, Jesse Phillips
jessekphillip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:28:54 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
You can deallocate the original array. The soon-to-be-deprecated method
Note:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:30:11 -0400, Cheng Wei riverch...@gmail.com wrote:
#import std.process
void main() {
execvp(ip, route);
}
result:
Object ute is unknown, try ip help.
That is the first two bytes are lost
Adding two spaces works:
#import std.process
void main() {
execvp(ip,
Hi all,
I've found nothing on bugzilla for that, what I'm missing? Or it's a bug? (DMD
2.055)
struct Bar {
immutable int i;
this(int j){ i = j; }
}
struct Foo {
Bar bar;
}
void main(){
auto b = Bar(1);
auto f = Foo();
f.bar = Bar(2); // Error: can only
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 04:12 Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Hi all,
I've found nothing on bugzilla for that, what I'm missing? Or it's a bug?
(DMD 2.055)
struct Bar {
immutable int i;
this(int j){ i = j; }
}
struct Foo {
Bar bar;
}
void main(){
auto b = Bar(1);
auto f =
On 09/22/2011 06:10 AM, Cheng Wei wrote:
Is this a bug or I use the binary heap wrongly? Thanks a lot!
Looks like a bug in Array. emplace doesn't accept a pointer to a chunk
for class types.
Report that puppy!
On 9/22/11 7:20 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Looks like a bug in Array. emplace doesn't accept a pointer to a chunk
for class types.
Report that puppy!
See
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/65a0c2158b1d2ea8e9d3094746739da636266089.
David
The discussion on Reddit brought to my attention that pure functions can return
and assign to an immutable.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/knn5p/thoughts_on_immutability_in_d/c2lsgek
I am trying to modify the example request to make use of this, but have failed.
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:43:09 +0200, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Great answer ! Thank you very much, it answered almost everything !
But what about, in the exemple you gave me (which is great by the way)
if foo as parameters ? Those parameters are passed on the stack by copy
to the
On 22.09.2011 22:53, Jesse Phillips wrote:
The discussion on Reddit brought to my attention that pure functions can return
and assign to an immutable.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/knn5p/thoughts_on_immutability_in_d/c2lsgek
I am trying to modify the example request to make use
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 23:36:40 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 22.09.2011 22:53, Jesse Phillips wrote:
The discussion on Reddit brought to my attention that pure functions can
return and assign to an immutable.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/knn5p/thoughts_on_immutabil
import std.typetuple;
import std.traits;
struct Foo
{
this(T1, T2)(T1 x, T2 y) if (allSatisfy!(isIntegral, T1, T2))
{
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
}
this(P)(P point) // ..constraints needed of course
{
this(point.x, point.y);
}
int x, y;
}
struct
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:44:21 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 23:36:40 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 22.09.2011 22:53, Jesse Phillips wrote:
The discussion on Reddit brought to my attention that pure functions
can
return and assign to an
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:09:29 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:44:21 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 23:36:40 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 22.09.2011 22:53, Jesse Phillips wrote:
The discussion
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 16:09:29 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:44:21 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 23:36:40 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 22.09.2011 22:53, Jesse Phillips wrote:
The discussion on Reddit
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 16:11:05 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:09:29 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:44:21 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 23:36:40 Dmitry
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:15:20 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 16:09:29 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Technically, something like this could be cast to immutable:
T[] foo(const(T)[] arg) pure
Since it can be proven that the result is new
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:23:12 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 16:11:05 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:09:29 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:44:21 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 13:25 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:15:20 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 16:09:29 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Technically, something like this could be cast to immutable:
T[]
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 14:03 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
In any case, in order for a function to be able to have its return value
implicitly value implicitly cast to immutable, it must pure and all of its
arguments must be immutable[...]
Ouch! I really must reread my posts more before
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 14:10 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:03:08 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
In any case, in order for a function to be able to have its return value
implicitly value implicitly cast to immutable, it must pure and all of
import std.string;
import std.traits;
import std.typetuple;
void main()
{
if (allSatisfy!(isNumeric, int, short))
{
}
}
D:\DMD\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\typetuple.d(576): Error:
template instance F is not a template declaration, it is a overloadset
This took a good while
Dmitry Olshansky Wrote:
Maybe:
-
List!T makeFromArray(T)(immutable T[] array) pure {
--
Dmitry Olshansky
Thank you this lets it compile. I think I had that somewhere, but forgot about
it. As Steve mentions, it probably should also work for const arguments too.
Jesse Phillips:
Thank you this lets it compile. I think I had that somewhere, but forgot
about it. As Steve mentions, it probably should also work for const arguments
too.
If you are convinced of this, then I suggest you to add an enhancement request
in Phobos about it. It will make purity
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 15:36 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
import std.string;
import std.traits;
import std.typetuple;
void main()
{
if (allSatisfy!(isNumeric, int, short))
{
}
}
D:\DMD\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\typetuple.d(576): Error:
template instance F is not a
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 16:45 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 15:36 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
import std.string;
import std.traits;
import std.typetuple;
void main()
{
if (allSatisfy!(isNumeric, int, short))
{
}
}
On 9/23/11, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Though given that allSatisfy!(isNumeric, int, short) will work with
std.traits.isNumeric and not std.string.isNumeric, I suspect that a template
constraint could be added which would fix the problem simply by checking
whether the
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 17:03 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/23/11, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Though given that allSatisfy!(isNumeric, int, short) will work with
std.traits.isNumeric and not std.string.isNumeric, I suspect that a
template constraint could be added
32 matches
Mail list logo
