I was thinking to implement a redblack tree by myself so it's perfect!
Il giorno lun, 28/11/2011 alle 08.44 -0800, Jonathan M Davis ha scritto:
On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:09:45 Andrea Fontana wrote:
Thank you! I didn't check for std.container module :)
I should warn you that
Also take a look at dcollections 2.0:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcollections (the d2 branch). I think
RBT was derived from there by Steven himself. Or maybe I'm thinking of
another structure.
I seem to have another problem with the function pointer approach. I
am trying to set up a function that would pass the function pointers
from C to D, and DMD refuses to compile it:
If I have the function pointer struct with D calling convention
pointers, like this:
struct
On 2011-11-29 12:53, Dainius (GreatEmerald) wrote:
I seem to have another problem with the function pointer approach. I
am trying to set up a function that would pass the function pointers
from C to D, and DMD refuses to compile it:
If I have the function pointer struct with D calling
This D2 program runs in about 5.13 seconds on my PC:
import std.stdio;
void main() {
auto f = File(bytes_test.dat, wb);
ubyte[3] RGB;
foreach (_; 0 .. 1_000_000)
f.rawWrite(RGB);
}
While this C program runs in about 0.14 seconds:
#include stdio.h
int main() {
FILE *f
Le 29/11/2011 04:11, Andrej Mitrovic a écrit :
On 11/29/11, bearophilebearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Do you know why the compiler doesn't ask you for a cast, and why the run
does that?
Because foreach is broken?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4510
No it has nothing to do
I meant that in a sarcastic way. :)
deadalnix:
No it has nothing to do with this bug.
I tend to agree.
But actually, this exemple should
generate a warning at least, or being illegal eventually.
I'd like that code to loop on all array 256 items once, and then stop :-)
Bye,
bearophile
Ah, I see, that makes sense. And it now compiles correctly, thanks.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:42:54 -0500, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw, is the new std.process hosted anywhere? My solution is
windows-specific and probably doesn't handle all the edge-cases. Even
if the new std.process isn't ready yet I'd love to look at your
Am 29.11.2011, 14:53 Uhr, schrieb bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com:
deadalnix:
No it has nothing to do with this bug.
I tend to agree.
But actually, this exemple should
generate a warning at least, or being illegal eventually.
I'd like that code to loop on all array 256 items once,
Am 29.11.2011, 20:41 Uhr, schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
Am 29.11.2011, 14:53 Uhr, schrieb bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com:
deadalnix:
No it has nothing to do with this bug.
I tend to agree.
But actually, this exemple should
generate a warning at least, or being illegal
On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 20:42:59 Marco Leise wrote:
Am 29.11.2011, 20:41 Uhr, schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
Am 29.11.2011, 14:53 Uhr, schrieb bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com:
deadalnix:
No it has nothing to do with this bug.
I tend to agree.
But actually, this
On 29.11.2011 16:00, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
Your OS is Windows, right? On Windows, rawWrite and rawRead always
flushes stream, sets binary mode, reads/writes, flushes stream again,
sets previous mode. This is definitely unnecessary slow - at least it
should change mode only if needed (the
On 11/29/2011 08:00 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
29.11.2011 15:57, bearophile пишет:
This D2 program runs in about 5.13 seconds on my PC:
import std.stdio;
void main() {
auto f = File(bytes_test.dat, wb);
ubyte[3] RGB;
foreach (_; 0 .. 1_000_000)
f.rawWrite(RGB);
}
While this C program
On 11/29/2011 01:20 PM, torhu wrote:
On 29.11.2011 16:00, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
Your OS is Windows, right? On Windows, rawWrite and rawRead always
flushes stream, sets binary mode, reads/writes, flushes stream again,
sets previous mode. This is definitely unnecessary slow - at least it
Dear
I convert my lib tango/d1 to phobos/d2 so i need use std.xml but i have
heard they are sometime ago std.xml will be updated. I do not want do
twice time the works. So my question is: std.xml will be deprecated or
not ?
thanks
On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 23:47:33 bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear
I convert my lib tango/d1 to phobos/d2 so i need use std.xml but i have
heard they are sometime ago std.xml will be updated. I do not want do
twice time the works. So my question is: std.xml will be deprecated or
not ?
Yes.
bioinfornatics Wrote:
Dear
I convert my lib tango/d1 to phobos/d2 so i need use std.xml but i have
heard they are sometime ago std.xml will be updated. I do not want do
twice time the works. So my question is: std.xml will be deprecated or
not ?
thanks
I don't think there is an
http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/2011-March/098950.html
Le mardi 29 novembre 2011 à 18:10 -0500, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 23:47:33 bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear
I convert my lib tango/d1 to phobos/d2 so i need use std.xml but i have
heard they are sometime ago std.xml will be updated. I do not want do
twice time
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 03:42:33 bioinfornatics wrote:
Le mardi 29 novembre 2011 à 18:10 -0500, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 23:47:33 bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear
I convert my lib tango/d1 to phobos/d2 so i need use std.xml but i
have
heard they are
On 2011-11-29 23:47, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear
I convert my lib tango/d1 to phobos/d2 so i need use std.xml but i have
heard they are sometime ago std.xml will be updated. I do not want do
twice time the works. So my question is: std.xml will be deprecated or
not ?
thanks
I've created a
23 matches
Mail list logo
