Hi,
I'm having a problem getting templates to work correctly.
I want to handle arrays differently, but when I try to compile
the following example code it says it matches more than 1
template. What is the correct way to do this?
--
void main()
{
foo(1);
foo([1,1]);
}
void foo(T)(T
Cube:
I'm having a problem getting templates to work correctly.
I want to handle arrays differently, but when I try to compile
the following example code it says it matches more than 1
template. What is the correct way to do this?
--
void main()
{
foo(1);
foo([1,1]);
}
void
On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 at 17:50:31 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/11/2012 08:12 AM, Zardoz wrote:
Could you please move MapIntegrator() to module-level. Then it
should work.
Ali
I try it and now even with normal Map function give me errors
with dmd !
public Entity MapIntegrator (
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 12:34:34 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Cube:
I'm having a problem getting templates to work correctly.
I want to handle arrays differently, but when I try to compile
the following example code it says it matches more than 1
template. What is the correct way to do
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 12:34:34 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Cube:
I'm having a problem getting templates to work correctly.
I want to handle arrays differently, but when I try to compile
the following example code it says it matches more than 1
template. What is the correct way to do
ixid:
It's a pity it doesn't see T[] as the best fit and go with it
on that basis.
It's not a pity, it's a good design. Best fit makes
languagecompiler complex, less predictable for the programmer,
etc.
Bye,
bearophile
How I can compile with static linking with dmd ?
I try with dmd -L-static
but i get this error :
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
I used before gdc with -static options and owrked well on it, but
I need to use now dmd.
Better example code for my other problem. How can I make the 3rd
foo work on Datas?
--
struct Data(T)
{
T elem;
}
void main()
{
foo(1);
foo([1,1]);
auto tmp1 = new Data!(int);
tmp1.elem = 3;
foo(tmp1);
auto tmp2 = new Data!(string);
On 12/12/2012 05:47 AM, Zardoz wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 at 17:50:31 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/11/2012 08:12 AM, Zardoz wrote:
Could you please move MapIntegrator() to module-level. Then it should
work.
Ali
I try it and now even with normal Map function give me errors with
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 15:21:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/12/2012 06:49 AM, Cube wrote:
Better example code for my other problem. How can I make the
3rd foo
work on Datas?
--
struct Data(T)
{
T elem;
}
Data is a struct template, not a type (until instantiated).
void
Ali Çehreli:
This works:
void foo(T)(T t) if(is(T == Data!T))
Try:
void foo(T)(Data!T t) {
Bye,
bearophile
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 14:21:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
ixid:
It's a pity it doesn't see T[] as the best fit and go with it
on that basis.
It's not a pity, it's a good design. Best fit makes
languagecompiler complex, less predictable for the programmer,
etc.
Bye,
bearophile
On 12/12/2012 07:37 AM, Cube wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 15:21:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/12/2012 06:49 AM, Cube wrote:
Better example code for my other problem. How can I make the
3rd foo
work on Datas?
--
struct Data(T)
{
T elem;
}
Data is a struct
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 15:28:46 Zardoz wrote:
How I can compile with static linking with dmd ?
I try with dmd -L-static
but i get this error :
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
I used before gdc with -static options and owrked well on it, but
I need to use now dmd.
At this
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 14:28:48 UTC, Zardoz wrote:
How I can compile with static linking with dmd ?
I try with dmd -L-static
but i get this error :
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
I used before gdc with -static options and owrked well on it,
but I need to use now dmd.
Try
ixid:
It seems very similar to a function overload to me. Why is
picking T[] in preference to T different to picking uint over
ulong for an overloaded function used on a uint?
The name T can refer to any type, including a U[], while built-in
types like uint are atomic, they can't refer to a
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 01:09:28 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Take the example here:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/vrupqijwqmccdpabm...@forum.dlang.org
note how he provides the body of the method in the mixin. I
would like to something similar to what he has done but provide
the body of the
Why doesn't the below code compile?
How to rewrite it so that it does?
Using: DMD64 D Compiler v2.060.
Thank you.
Code:
import std.algorithm, std.ascii, std.stdio;
void main()
{
char[] rot13 = lowercase.dup;
bringToFront(rot13[0 .. 13], rot13[13 .. $]);
On 12/12/2012 05:18 PM, Mu wrote:
Why doesn't the below code compile?
How to rewrite it so that it does?
Using: DMD64 D Compiler v2.060.
Thank you.
Code:
import std.algorithm, std.ascii, std.stdio;
void main()
{
char[] rot13 = lowercase.dup;
bringToFront(rot13[0 ..
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 17:34:53 Ali Çehreli wrote:
(There must be an easier way of doing that. :))
If you have a string that's really ASCII and you're _sure_ that it's only
ASCII, then I'd suggest simply casting it to immutable(ubyte)[] and operating
on that with all range based
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:01:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/10/2012 01:52 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
I want to avoid having to wrap the code with
as it disables highlighting and possibly other
features(intellisense,
etc...))
The q{} syntax is supposed to help with that issue. Emacs
Am 13.12.2012 04:32, schrieb js.mdnq:
I think the issue I have with all this is that when you put code
inside a string you lose a lot of compile time features AFAICT.
your right - but...try to come up with an similar (easy to implement)
powerfull solution that is not based on strings and you
22 matches
Mail list logo
