auto http = HTTP("dlang.org");
http.onReceive = (ubyte[] data)
{
writeln(cast(string) (data));
return data.length;
};
http.proxy = "192.168.111.111";
http.proxyPort = 1788;
WHAT HERE ?
http.perform();
//
how to make Сurl authorize on a pr
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 20:42:49 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I'll try that now. Somehow the 1.msecs solution doesn't seem
> clean enough.
it seems that you want thread messaging to be integrated in your event
loop. sorry, there is no easy way to do it now. maybe if libasync will
bec
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 20:31:29 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 20:16:56 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Say i have created a program written in D, what tools are
available for me to track memory allocations?
If you write a program and its performance is slow because yo
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 18:08:40 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/02/2014 06:49 AM, Chris wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 13:05:00 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:36:06 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
you can use receiveTimeout! to chec
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 20:16:56 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Say i have created a program written in D, what tools are
available for me to track memory allocations?
If you write a program and its performance is slow because you
suspect too many allocations are taking place in unrecognis
Say i have created a program written in D, what tools are
available for me to track memory allocations?
If you write a program and its performance is slow because you
suspect too many allocations are taking place in unrecognised
areas, what tools or techniques do you use to find where they are
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 17:56:29 UTC, AsmMan wrote:
I'd like to check if a function got CTFE, ie, the compiler was
able to replace my foo(s); by the computed value at
compile-time.
I'm trying to convert the binary executable to assembly by
using objconv tool but I'm finding it very dif
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 18:42:56 UTC, AsmMan wrote:
I was thiking the dmd compiler did CTFE without someone ask for
this, in the way as I've mentioned, checking for constant
arguments + function's purity and if all this is true, it did
the CTFE rather than generate code to compute it at
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:04:56PM +, anonymous via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 18:42:56 UTC, AsmMan wrote:
> >I was thiking the dmd compiler did CTFE without someone ask for this,
> >in the way as I've mentioned, checking for constant arguments +
> >function's
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 18:42:56 UTC, AsmMan wrote:
I was thiking the dmd compiler did CTFE without someone ask for
this, in the way as I've mentioned, checking for constant
arguments + function's purity and if all this is true, it did
the CTFE rather than generate code to compute it at
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 18:17:12 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 17:56:29 UTC, AsmMan wrote:
I'd like to check if a function got CTFE, ie, the compiler was
able to replace my foo(s); by the computed value at
compile-time.
I'm trying to convert the binary executable
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 18:02:30 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 17:56:29 UTC, AsmMan wrote:
I'd like to check if a function got CTFE, ie, the compiler was
able to replace my foo(s); by the computed value at
compile-time.
You have to explicitly force ctfe with
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 17:56:29 UTC, AsmMan wrote:
I'd like to check if a function got CTFE, ie, the compiler was
able to replace my foo(s); by the computed value at
compile-time.
I'm trying to convert the binary executable to assembly by
using objconv tool but I'm finding it very dif
On 10/02/2014 06:49 AM, Chris wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 13:05:00 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:36:06 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
you can use receiveTimeout! to check if there is some message available.
That won't do. It blocks th
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 17:56:29 UTC, AsmMan wrote:
I'd like to check if a function got CTFE, ie, the compiler was
able to replace my foo(s); by the computed value at
compile-time.
You have to explicitly force ctfe with context, it is never done
automatically, and if it fails, the buil
I'd like to check if a function got CTFE, ie, the compiler was
able to replace my foo(s); by the computed value at compile-time.
I'm trying to convert the binary executable to assembly by using
objconv tool but I'm finding it very diffucult to find anything
in there, since some converters I've
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 14:17:42 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 13:53:48 UTC, Sycam_Inc wrote:
when running in the browser the page just continues to load
and the lighttpd console shows no output from it and it dosent
write anything in the file.
What url did y
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 13:53:48 UTC, Sycam_Inc wrote:
when running in the browser the page just continues to load and
the lighttpd console shows no output from it and it dosent
write anything in the file.
What url did you use in the browser and what's your lighttpd
config look like? T
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 13:49:33 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> That won't do. It blocks the main thread too (for the duration of
> timeout)
don't do hour-long timeouts. 1ms timeout is actually
"poll-and-receive". can't see any problems with it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 13:25:14 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Try running the program yourself with a port argument
yourprogram.exe --port 3000
for example, then have lighttpd configured to connect to that
port for the application. That's what I had to do for nginx on
Windows, lighttpd mi
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 13:05:00 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:36:06 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
you can use receiveTimeout! to check if there is some message
available.
That won't do. It blocks the main thread too (for the duration
Try running the program yourself with a port argument
yourprogram.exe --port 3000
for example, then have lighttpd configured to connect to that
port for the application. That's what I had to do for nginx on
Windows, lighttpd might be the same thing.
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 21:34:40 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 17:09:57 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
Does that even work? takeExactly would pop up to N
*codepoints*, whereas your string only has N *codeunits*.
Your're right again :)
If forgot that takeExactly auto-d
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:36:06 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Thanks. I was thinking of something like that, only I haven't
> found a way to set up non-blocking receives. What am I missing.
> I'm sure it's something trivial.
you can use receiveTimeout! to check if there is some mess
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 10:33:02 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
Just use non-blocking receives in main thread's event loop.
When you get a message from child thread that it's finished
playing and you decide you don't need that thread anymore, send
a message to child "you're dismissed". The child
Just use non-blocking receives in main thread's event loop. When
you get a message from child thread that it's finished playing
and you decide you don't need that thread anymore, send a message
to child "you're dismissed". The child should also have some loop
to check for incoming messages non-
What is the best way to kill a thread when it pleases the owner
(main thread)? The background is playing audio files. The
playback happens in a separate thread so the owner can keep on
listening to events triggered by the user (like stop, pause). I
have to queue audio files, wait until one has
This is a cross-post from the issue i started on github (i figure
i'll probably get a quicker response here)
FastCGI dosen't cooperate with LightTPD on windows.
as soon as lighttpd starts up and initializes fastcgi "unknown
listenType (0)" is printed out and the server shuts down
I've isolated
On 10/01/2014 10:00 PM, thedeemon wrote:
> Here's another benchmark:
> D AAs vs. Vibe.d's open addressing hashes vs. Robin Hood hashing:
> http://www.infognition.com/blog/2014/on_robin_hood_hashing.html
What a coincidence. :) Your blog article was written just two weeks ago.
Ali
29 matches
Mail list logo