On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 00:55:08 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 12/22/2014 9:21 AM, FrankLike wrote:
Now ,x64 mainform always have the console window,and
the entry
is main.
could you do it?
Thank you.
Since 64-bit DMD uses the Microsoft toolchain, you need to pass
a
Hi everybody,
I am a java developer and used C/C++ only for some home projects
so I never mastered native programming.
I am currently learning D and I find it fascinating. I was
reading the documentation about std.parallelism and I wanted to
experiment a bit with the example Find the
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 10:12:52 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
Now, can anyone explain why this program ran faster in Java? I
ran both programs multiple times and the results were always
close to this execution times.
Can the implementation of log() function be the reason for a
slower
I run Arch Linux on my PC. I compiled D programs using dmd-2.066
and used no compile arguments (dmd prog.d)
You should try use some arguments -O -release -inline -noboundscheck
and maybe try use gdc or ldc should help with performance
can you post your code in all languages somewhere? I like
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 10:35:52 UTC, Daniel Kozak via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I run Arch Linux on my PC. I compiled D programs using
dmd-2.066 and used no compile arguments (dmd prog.d)
You should try use some arguments -O -release -inline
-noboundscheck
and maybe try use gdc or
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 08:09:06 UTC, Joel wrote:
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 16:06:42 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 22:38:20 UTC, Joel wrote:
On Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 10:49:48 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
some self promo:
On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 10:12 +, Iov Gherman via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[…]
- D: 24 secs, 32 ms.
- Java: 20 secs, 881 ms.
- C: 21 secs
- Go: 37 secs
Without the source codes and the commands used to create and run, it
is impossible to offer constructive criticism of the results.
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 11:11:07 UTC, aldanor wrote:
Just tried it out myself (E5 Xeon / Linux):
D version: 19.64 sec (avg 3 runs)
import core.stdc.math;
void main() {
double s = 0;
foreach (i; 1 .. 1_000_000_000)
s += log(i);
}
// build
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 10:40:45 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 10:35:52 UTC, Daniel Kozak via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I run Arch Linux on my PC. I compiled D programs using
dmd-2.066 and used no compile arguments (dmd prog.d)
You should try use some
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 08:36:15 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 05:46 +, Dicebot via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 04:15:00 UTC, Rikki
Cattermole wrote:
b) Can I do parallel builds with dub. CMake gives me
Replacing import core.stdc.math with import std.math in the
D example increases the avg runtime from 19.64 to 23.87 seconds
(~20% slower) which is consistent with OP's statement.
+ GDC/LDC vs DMD
+ nobounds, release
Do you think we should start a topic on D wiki front page for
On 23/12/2014 1:39 a.m., uri wrote:
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 08:36:15 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 05:46 +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 04:15:00 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
b) Can I do
Hi Guys,
First of all, thank you all for responding so quick, it is so
nice to see D having such an active community.
As I said in my first post, I used no other parameters to dmd
when compiling because I don't know too much about dmd
compilation flags. I can't wait to try the flags Daniel
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:05:19 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
Hi Guys,
First of all, thank you all for responding so quick, it is so
nice to see D having such an active community.
As I said in my first post, I used no other parameters to dmd
when compiling because I don't know too much
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:16:05 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:05:19 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
Hi Guys,
First of all, thank you all for responding so quick, it is so
nice to see D having such an active community.
As I said in my first post, I used no other
So, I did some more testing with the one processing in paralel:
--- dmd:
4 secs, 977 ms
--- dmd with flags: -O -release -inline -noboundscheck:
4 secs, 635 ms
--- ldc:
6 secs, 271 ms
--- gdc:
10 secs, 439 ms
I also pushed the new bash scripts to the git repository.
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:28:12 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
So, I did some more testing with the one processing in paralel:
--- dmd:
4 secs, 977 ms
--- dmd with flags: -O -release -inline -noboundscheck:
4 secs, 635 ms
--- ldc:
6 secs, 271 ms
--- gdc:
10 secs, 439 ms
I also pushed the
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:28:12 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
So, I did some more testing with the one processing in paralel:
--- dmd:
4 secs, 977 ms
--- dmd with flags: -O -release -inline -noboundscheck:
4 secs, 635 ms
--- ldc:
6 secs, 271 ms
--- gdc:
10 secs, 439 ms
I also pushed the
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4200
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 18:00:18 UTC, aldanor wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:28:12 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
So, I did some more testing with the one processing in paralel:
--- dmd:
4 secs, 977 ms
--- dmd with flags: -O -release -inline -noboundscheck:
4 secs, 635 ms
--- ldc:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:50:20 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:28:12 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
So, I did some more testing with the one processing in paralel:
--- dmd:
4 secs, 977 ms
--- dmd with flags: -O -release -inline -noboundscheck:
4 secs, 635 ms
---
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 19:11:13 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/22/2014 10:06 AM, aldanor wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4200
Thank you! This fixes a big problem with the contracts in D.
Ali
It's not my PR but I just thought this thread would be happy to
On 12/22/2014 10:06 AM, aldanor wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4200
Thank you! This fixes a big problem with the contracts in D.
Ali
On 22/12/14 19:06, aldanor via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4200
Yes, I saw that PR with some joy -- thanks for the link! :-)
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 18:23:29 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 18:00:18 UTC, aldanor wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:28:12 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
So, I did some more testing with the one processing in
paralel:
--- dmd:
4 secs, 977 ms
--- dmd with
On 22/12/14 20:12, aldanor via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 19:11:13 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/22/2014 10:06 AM, aldanor wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4200
Thank you! This fixes a big problem with the contracts in D.
Ali
It's
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 18:27:48 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:50:20 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:28:12 UTC, Iov Gherman wrote:
So, I did some more testing with the one processing in
paralel:
--- dmd:
4 secs, 977 ms
--- dmd
Now,if you want to know whether a exe is in processes
,you must use the win API.Do you have any other idea?
The windows api is how I'd do it - look up how to do it in C,
then do the same thing in D.
That's very different to my results.
I see no important difference between ldc and dmd when using
std.math, but when using core.stdc.math ldc halves its time
where dmd only manages to get to ~80%
What CPU do you have? On my Intel Core i3 I have similar
experience as Iov Gherman, but on my
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 11:04:10 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 08:09:06 UTC, Joel wrote:
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 16:06:42 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 22:38:20 UTC, Joel wrote:
On Thursday, 11 September 2014
31 matches
Mail list logo
