Re: IMAP library
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 14:31:56 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: Am Sun, 12 Apr 2015 17:27:31 + schrieb Jens Bauer doc...@who.no: I won't say it's impossible, but it would be cumbersome processing email on an AVR. There are HTTP servers for AVR(8bit) devices, so it should be possible. That's absolutely true, but usually they're very simple. You can interface the AVR to an external SRAM or NOR-flash and thus store the entire email (or Web-page) there. But imagine that someone sends an email with an attachment - or just writes 50K of babbling. -That might be difficult if you have an AVR with only 8K RAM. It's much easier - and perhaps cheaper - to pick a Cortex-M, which has most of the things you need already; you can get ethernet PHYs for less than $2, which interfaces with a Cortex-M.
Re: IMAP library
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 18:03:12 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote: On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 14:31:56 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: Am Sun, 12 Apr 2015 17:27:31 + schrieb Jens Bauer doc...@who.no: I won't say it's impossible, but it would be cumbersome processing email on an AVR. There are HTTP servers for AVR(8bit) devices, so it should be possible. That's absolutely true, but usually they're very simple. You can interface the AVR to an external SRAM or NOR-flash and thus store the entire email (or Web-page) there. But imagine that someone sends an email with an attachment - or just writes 50K of babbling. -That might be difficult if you have an AVR with only 8K RAM. It's much easier - and perhaps cheaper - to pick a Cortex-M, which has most of the things you need already; you can get ethernet PHYs for less than $2, which interfaces with a Cortex-M. I am reminded of the constraints from these days: http://www.abook.ru/dmk/FidoNet/unpublished/fhist.html My first 'open source' contribution was to a data structure in his BBS system a few years later.
Re: IMAP library
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 02:31:23 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: You might like my email.d too https://github.com/adamdruppe/arsd/blob/master/email.d It is able to help construct emails and also read an mbox format - part of that code might help your imap library too. Thanks, Adam. Was just thinking earlier today that I should reread that code. Laeeth
Re: DMD 64 bit on Windows
Main article here: http://wiki.dlang.org/Installing_DMD_on_64-bit_Windows_7_%28COFF-compatible%29
DMD 64 bit on Windows
I'm currently experiencing Out Of Memory errors when compiling in DMD on Windows Has anyone found a way to compile a DMD x86_64 compiler on Windows?
Re: DMD 64 bit on Windows
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 01:31:27 UTC, Etienne wrote: I'm currently experiencing Out Of Memory errors when compiling in DMD on Windows Has anyone found a way to compile a DMD x86_64 compiler on Windows? For example, here: https://translate.google.ru/translate?hl=rusl=rutl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fblogsoftware.ru%2Fpost%2F116109292742%2F64-x-dmd
Re: DMD 64 bit on Windows
On 4/13/2015 9:42 PM, Dennis Ritchie wrote: Main article here: http://wiki.dlang.org/Installing_DMD_on_64-bit_Windows_7_%28COFF-compatible%29 I think this might be about the -m64 option in the d compiler. I'm actually having the Out Of Memory error with the -m64 option, because DMD crashes at 4gb of ram What I need is DMD compiled with 64 bit pointer size
Re: IMAP library
You might like my email.d too https://github.com/adamdruppe/arsd/blob/master/email.d It is able to help construct emails and also read an mbox format - part of that code might help your imap library too.
Re: writefln patterns with mismatching compile-time known number of arguments
On Sunday, 12 April 2015 at 21:34:21 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 02:33:03PM +, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:18:21 +, JR wrote: But the compiler has all the pieces of information needed to see it's wrong, doesn't it? no, it doesn't. compiler doesn't know about `std.format.format` and it's special abilities. while it is possible to add such checks to the compiler, it will introduce interdependency between compiler and phobos, which is not desirable. writing CTFE `writef` version is possible without template bloat in binary, but it will take more memory in compile time and slows compilation. there were talks about having `writef!fmt(args)` in phobos, but nobody took that task yet. It's not hard to write a CTFE version of writef/writeln/etc., that takes the format argument at compile-time, since std.format itself is already CTFE-able. Except for floating-point values (at least).
Re: Auto ref function : How is this possible ?
Thanks for the tip ! I was looking at something like this.
Re: IMAP library
Am Sun, 12 Apr 2015 17:27:31 + schrieb Jens Bauer doc...@who.no: On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 22:45:39 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Yes - nice to know it can do that also. For me I need to have a way of managing large amounts of email (I have about 2mm messages) including for natural language processing etc. Dovecot/sieve + pipe facility is ok, but not perfect for everything. I guess it should work fine for regular ARM etc - perhaps not an Arduino! I won't say it's impossible, but it would be cumbersome processing email on an AVR. There are HTTP servers for AVR(8bit) devices, so it should be possible. Doesn't mean it's a good idea though ;-)
Re: Auto ref function : How is this possible ?
On 4/11/15 6:08 AM, matovitch wrote:
Hi,
I just learn about auto ref functions and tried this :
import std.stdio;
auto ref foo(int i, ref float f)
{
if (i f)
{
return i;
}
else
{
return f;
}
}
void main()
{
int i = 1;
float f1 = 1.1;
float f2 = 0.9;
writeln(foo(i, f1));
writeln(foo(i, f2));
}
Tricky questions : Does it compiles ? If yes what does it do ?
Then my question : How is this possible ?
D has great compile-time tools to examine what the compiler is doing.
A great feature of D for investigating compiler internals is pragma(msg,
...). This prints at compile time some message (a string) that is based
on the state at the time. For example:
void main()
{
int i = 1;
float f1 = 1.1;
float f2 = 0.9;
pragma(msg, typeof(foo(i, f1)).stringof); // prints what type
foo returns
auto x = foo(i, f2);
pragma(msg, typeof(x).stringof); // same thing, but easier to
understand.
}
result (prints while compiling):
float
float
-Steve
Re: writefln patterns with mismatching compile-time known number of arguments
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:31:40 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: It's not hard to write a CTFE version of writef/writeln/etc., that takes the format argument at compile-time, since std.format itself is already CTFE-able. i didn't know that (didn't checked, actually), so i rewrote simple string and number formatters in my iv.writer. anyway, `std.format` will allocate on %40s, i believe, which is completely unnecessary for `write`, as one can write by arbitrary sized chunks. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
