On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 21:56:54 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
Just ran the unittests under the dmd profiler, says the
algorithm is 11% faster now. So yeah slightly more optimized.
Ran some more tests.
Without optimization but with with 4 levels (a 2.5Mb table), it
gains to a whopping
On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 15:02:11 UTC, error wrote:
On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 14:43:18 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Try:
foreach(i, v; vars) {
vars[i] = ...;
}
Perfect! Thanks so much - I wish that hint was in the
documentation for variadic functions, although I guess
problem solved now.
Just not use gc_setProxy.
On Sunday, 12 February 2017 at 00:43:55 UTC, Nestor wrote:
I fail to see where you are declaring QG10Matrix2, because
apparently it's an array of chars, but buildMatrix2 returns an
array of int (2560 elements??) with lots of -1 values.
I declared it here:
On 02/12/2017 12:15 AM, Random D user wrote:
I can init a variable from mutable source without defining any
constructor or assignment operators, but not if the source is const. I
would imagine the behavior to be the same with mutable and const source,
since it's just reading the source and
On 02/11/2017 03:15 PM, Random D user wrote:
> I can init a variable from mutable source without defining any
> constructor or assignment operators, but not if the source is const. I
> would imagine the behavior to be the same with mutable and const source,
> since it's just reading the source
On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 21:41:11 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 21:02:40 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
Yes i know, which is why i had 3 to calculate 2 inputs
because the third is the temp/previous calculation.
Alright I've found the bug and fixed it, and it
I can init a variable from mutable source without defining any
constructor or assignment operators, but not if the source is
const. I would imagine the behavior to be the same with mutable
and const source, since it's just reading the source and copying
it.
Is there a reason for this? Or is
On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 21:41:11 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
But it seriously is a lot of overhead for such a simple
function.
Just ran the unittests under the dmd profiler, says the
algorithm is 11% faster now. So yeah slightly more optimized.
Another level and we could probably
On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 21:02:40 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
Yes i know, which is why i had 3 to calculate 2 inputs because
the third is the temp/previous calculation.
Alright I've found the bug and fixed it, and it passes with
flying colors (brute force tests up to 6 digits);
On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 20:19:51 UTC, Nestor wrote:
Notice this is no ordinary matrix, but an Anti-Simmetric
QuasiGroup of order 10, and tmpdigit (called interim in the
algorithm) is used in each round (although the function isn't
recursive) together with each digit to calculate final
On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 11:45:02 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 11:27:02 UTC, Nestor wrote:
Thank you for the detailed reply. I wasn't able to follow you
regarding the multilevel stuff though :(
The idea behind it is like this (which you can scale up):
On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 14:43:18 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Try:
foreach(i, v; vars) {
vars[i] = ...;
}
Perfect! Thanks so much - I wish that hint was in the
documentation for variadic functions, although I guess it
suggests an inefficiency in the compiler - since there
Thanks for the clarifications.
On Saturday, 11 February 2017 at 00:16:04 UTC, sarn wrote:
If you explicitly initialise the array to all 0.0, you should
see it disappear from the binary.
I was actually wondering whether initialisation would make a
difference, so thank you for this.
Bastiaan.
On 12/02/2017 3:41 AM, error wrote:
I'm making a serializer that has a variadic write method that takes
arbitrary params
and serializes them; I want to do the same thing with a read method (
pass in your
params by ref, and it populates them with data ) - however, I run into
a compiler
error -
I'm making a serializer that has a variadic write method that
takes arbitrary params
and serializes them; I want to do the same thing with a read
method ( pass in your
params by ref, and it populates them with data ) - however, I
run into a compiler
error - "cannot be ref" in the foreach
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 11:27:02 UTC, Nestor wrote:
Thank you for the detailed reply. I wasn't able to follow you
regarding the multilevel stuff though :(
The idea behind it is like this (which you can scale up):
static immutable int[] QG10Matrix2 = buildMatrix2();
int[]
18 matches
Mail list logo
