On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 18:49:54 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
Doesn't work for me. This still fails compilation with the same
error:
import std.algorithm.iteration : sum, cumulativeFold;
void main()
{
double[5] a;
auto asum = 1.23;
auto jProbs = a[].cumulativeFold!((a, b) =>
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 20:55:21 UTC, Sasszem wrote:
If I write "auto a = new De()", then it calls the scope first,
no matter where I place it.
Because with `new`
a) your struct object is located on the heap (and referred to by
pointer - `De*`) instead of the stack (which means no
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 20:55:21 UTC, Sasszem wrote:
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 20:30:20 UTC, Jerry wrote:
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 20:26:05 UTC, Sasszem wrote:
[...]
It's called inbetween the destructors of wherever you put the
scope(exit).
import std.stdio;
struct
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 20:30:20 UTC, Jerry wrote:
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 20:26:05 UTC, Sasszem wrote:
[...]
It's called inbetween the destructors of wherever you put the
scope(exit).
import std.stdio;
struct De
{
~this() { writeln("De"); }
}
void main()
{
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 20:26:05 UTC, Sasszem wrote:
I'm currently working on a project and for that I've created a
thin OO-wrapper on top of derelict-sdl. However, when I close
my app, the program terminates with a segfault. I've managed to
track down the source, and found that the
I'm currently working on a project and for that I've created a
thin OO-wrapper on top of derelict-sdl. However, when I close my
app, the program terminates with a segfault. I've managed to
track down the source, and found that the destructors of my
objects are called AFTER the scope(exit)
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 18:49:54 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 09/18/2017 08:25 PM, user1234 wrote:
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 14:45:25 UTC, Alex wrote:
[...]
import std.algorithm.iteration : sum, cumulativeFold;
void main()
{
double[5] a;
[...]>> auto asum = a[].sum;
[...]
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 11:27:01 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 00:33:25 UTC, Matt Jones wrote:
I've been reading the DerelictSDL2 source code. I think I have
a handle on it. I'll have to look more at the wiki too.
Thanks.
Might be interesting to write up
On 09/18/2017 08:25 PM, user1234 wrote:
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 14:45:25 UTC, Alex wrote:
[...]
import std.algorithm.iteration : sum, cumulativeFold;
void main()
{
double[5] a;
[...]>> auto asum = a[].sum;
[...]
asum is a lazy range and the error comes from this.
asum is
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 14:45:25 UTC, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
given this code:
import std.algorithm.iteration : sum, cumulativeFold;
void main()
{
double[5] a;
a = 0;
foreach(el; a) assert(el == 0);
a[0] = 1.0;
a[1] = 2.0;
a[2] = 3.0;
void main() {
auto s = S();
s["b", "c"] = s["a"];
}
Prints
a
["b", "c"]
Ali
I thought about this too, thanks!
Have you considered the multiple indexes?
https://dlang.org/spec/operatoroverloading.html#index_assignment_operator
It may give you some power in execution order.
import std.stdio;
struct S {
auto opIndex(string index) {
writeln(index);
return 42;
}
auto
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 15:14:20 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 15:11:34 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
gets rewritten to
---
t.opIndex("b").opIndexAssign(t["a"].value, "c");
---
Sorry, forgot one level of rewriting:
---
On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 05:33:12 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Skip Revo-Uninstaller, no idea why you'd ever use such trial
software.
Anyway what you want is CCleaner, standard software that all
Windows installs should have on hand.
On 2017-09-16 10:33 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 17/09/2017 6:30 AM, Enjoys Math wrote:
Series of messages from installer:
DMD v2.076.0 is installed on your system
Press 'OK' to replace by DMD 2.076.0
An error occurred when removing DMD v2.076.0
Run 'dmd-2.076.0.exe /f to force install
And
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 15:11:34 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
gets rewritten to
---
t.opIndex("b").opIndexAssign(t["a"].value, "c");
---
Sorry, forgot one level of rewriting:
---
t.opIndex("b").opIndexAssign(t.opIndex("a").value, "c");
---
On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 18:52:39 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
struct Test{ [...] }
Test t;
As described in the spec [1]
t["a"] = 100;
gets rewritten to
---
t.opIndexAssign(100, "a");
---
, while
t["b"]["c"] = t["a"].value;
gets rewritten to
---
Hi all,
given this code:
import std.algorithm.iteration : sum, cumulativeFold;
void main()
{
double[5] a;
a = 0;
foreach(el; a) assert(el == 0);
a[0] = 1.0;
a[1] = 2.0;
a[2] = 3.0;
a[3] = 4.0;
a[4] = 5.0;
foreach(el; a)
I used to have a guide to creating "Derelictified" bindings for
an older version. I should write one up for the current version.
+1
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 11:27:01 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 00:33:25 UTC, Matt Jones wrote:
I've been reading the DerelictSDL2 source code. I think I have
a handle on it. I'll have to look more at the wiki too.
Thanks.
Might be interesting to write up
Should I report this as a bug?
I tried a C++ equivalent code and it execute in the expected
order.
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 11:47:07 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi All,
Can some one explain me on the below question.
Q1: void main (Array!string args) : Why can't we use container
array in void main?
Q2: What is the difference between the below?
insert, insertBack
stableInsert,
Hi All,
Can some one explain me on the below question.
Q1: void main (Array!string args) : Why can't we use container
array in void main?
Q2: What is the difference between the below?
insert, insertBack
stableInsert, stableInsertBack
linearInsert, stableLinearInsert, stableLinearInsert
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 00:33:25 UTC, Matt Jones wrote:
I've been reading the DerelictSDL2 source code. I think I have
a handle on it. I'll have to look more at the wiki too.
Thanks.
Might be interesting to write up your experience with doing it as
either blog post or part of
On Monday, 18 September 2017 at 02:04:49 UTC, bitwise wrote:
The following code will run fine on Windows, but crash on iOS
due to the misaligned access:
Interesting, does iOS crash such a process intentionally, or is
it a side effect?
char data[8];
int i = 0x;
int* p =
25 matches
Mail list logo
