On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 20:43:45 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 19:44:37 UTC, berni wrote:
a) I've got an int[] which contains only 0 und 1. And I want
to end with a string, containing 0 and 1. So [1,1,0,1,0,1]
should become "110101". Of course I can do this with
Can you post a complete, runnable example that illustrates your
problem?
Strange as it is, now it works here too... - I don't know, what
went wrong yesterday. Thanks anyway. :-)
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 18:05:58 UTC, Josphe Brigmo
wrote:
I have always gotten these types of errors on x64 and, it may
be my machine, it has happened with many dmd versions, visual D
and visual studio...
Oh, you mean the message that appears in Visual Studio, not
stderr.
Excepti
My project [1] has enough language coverage to expose two issues
that break compilation.
1. Stack overflow in ddmd/dtemplate.d:6241,
TemplateInstance::needsCodegen();
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18026
2. -allinst gives undefined reference linker errors;
https://issues.dlang.org/s
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 20:04:36 UTC, berni wrote:
Anotherone I'm not getting to work: From some output with
newlines I want to discard all lines, that start with a # and
select part of the other lines with a regex. (I know the regex
r".*" is quite useless, but it will be replaced by
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 11:44:05 AM MDT Jan via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 11:08:30 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Thanks for clarifying Jonathan :)
> But aren't the variables considered rvalues then?
No. variables are _always_ lvalues.
Anotherone I'm not getting to work: From some output with
newlines I want to discard all lines, that start with a # and
select part of the other lines with a regex. (I know the regex
r".*" is quite useless, but it will be replaced by something more
usefull.)
I tried the following, but non wor
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 8:45:55 AM MDT Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 21:16:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Yeah, though if you write cross-platform applications or
> > libraries (and ideally, most applications and libraries woul
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 14:57:20 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 05:50:53 UTC, Josphe Brigmo
wrote:
Privileged instruction
Lots of code. I pretty much always get this error.
Something must have gone really wrong to get this error. Most
likely, the
On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 11:08:30 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[...]
Thanks for clarifying Jonathan :)
But aren't the variables considered rvalues then?
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 05:39:48 UTC, berni wrote:
Oh, thanks. What I didn't know about was join. Now I wonder how
I could have found out about it, without asking here? Even yet
I know it's name I cannot find it, nighter in the language
documentation nor in the library documentation.
On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 05:50:53 UTC, Josphe Brigmo
wrote:
Privileged instruction
Lots of code. I pretty much always get this error.
Something must have gone really wrong to get this error. Most
likely, the CPU instruction pointer ended up in a memory area
without any code in it.
On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 21:16:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Yeah, though if you write cross-platform applications or
libraries (and ideally, most applications and libraries would
be platform-agnostic), you can't necessarily avoid all of the
Windows insanity, even if you yourself use a
On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 21:33:17 UTC, Paul Backus
wrote:
Another alternative is to write the function recursively:
void doByPair(T, Rest...)(string desc, T* valuePtr, Rest rest)
{
writefln("%s %s: %s", T.stringof, desc, *valuePtr);
if (rest.length) doByPair(rest);
}
Rest...
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 12:40:07 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Is it just a legacy thing?
Yeah, basically the ones that date back to before the @ thing
don't have it, and the ones after it do.
Why do some attributes have an @ symbol and others don't?
I thought it might be because some are used as keywords for other
things but then 'pure' doesn't follow that rule. Any ideas? Is it
just a legacy thing?
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 06:13:29 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 16:55:21 UTC, Josphe Brigmo
wrote:
On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 15:21:21 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
It woudln't help. I'm dealing with over a million files and
you'd need those files too.
But
17 matches
Mail list logo
