On Monday, 19 November 2018 at 21:23:31
On Monday, 19 November 2018 at 21:23:31 UTC, Jordi Gutiérrez
Hermoso wrote:
I'm not the only one who has done this. I can't find it right
now, but I've seen at least one person open a bug report
because they misunderstood this as a bug in dmd.
I have
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 01:31:12 UTC, mawk wrote:
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 00:43:59 UTC, Andrew Pennebaker
wrote:
Given that gcc v9 should have built-in support for compiling D
code, and that dmd requires gcc, will dmd continue to be
supported? Or perhaps have its guts incorporated
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 00:43:59 UTC, Andrew Pennebaker
wrote:
Given that gcc v9 should have built-in support for compiling D
code, and that dmd requires gcc, will dmd continue to be
supported? Or perhaps have its guts incorporated completely
into gcc?
DMD doesn't really require GCC, G
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 00:43:59 UTC, Andrew Pennebaker
wrote:
Given that gcc v9 should have built-in support for compiling D
code, and that dmd requires gcc, will dmd continue to be
supported?
dmd will continue to be supported.
Given that gcc v9 should have built-in support for compiling D
code, and that dmd requires gcc, will dmd continue to be
supported? Or perhaps have its guts incorporated completely into
gcc?
On Thursday, 29 November 2018 at 21:31:57 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 21:11:06 +, John Chapman wrote:
Is there any way to get a string representing a function's
exact signature as declared in the source? I can generate it
myself using reflection but it might not be 100% v
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 21:11:06 +, John Chapman wrote:
> Is there any way to get a string representing a function's exact
> signature as declared in the source? I can generate it myself using
> reflection but it might not be 100% verbatim so wanted to know if
> there's anything built in?
>
>f
Is there any way to get a string representing a function's exact
signature as declared in the source? I can generate it myself
using reflection but it might not be 100% verbatim so wanted to
know if there's anything built in?
foreach (m; __traits(allMembers, T)) {
alias member = __traits
Are you sure? Can you show me an example? I always forgot on this
limitation and somtimes it cause really nesty things :D
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:05 PM Antonio Corbi via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Reading through the `getopt` documentation at one p
On Thursday, 29 November 2018 at 14:51:40 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
You need to compile druntime in debug mode. One thing you can
do is implement the function locally, and then break on it
(it's a C linkage, so I think the linker will grab your copy
instead of the one in druntime)
i.e.
On Monday, 19 November 2018 at 21:23:31 UTC, Jordi Gutiérrez
Hermoso wrote:
When I was first playing with D, I managed to create a segfault
What's the reasoning for allowing this?
100 % agree that there should be non-nullable class references,
they're my main missing feature in D. Likewise,
On Thursday, 29 November 2018 at 17:12:28 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Thursday, 29 November 2018 at 16:24:58 UTC, bauss wrote:
Are there no support for references with mangling in D?
Like what about int&?
Of course, that's `ref int`. But a `ref CppClass` is
C++-mangled as `CppClass* &`.
I was hop
On Thursday, 29 November 2018 at 16:24:58 UTC, bauss wrote:
Are there no support for references with mangling in D?
Like what about int&?
Of course, that's `ref int`. But a `ref CppClass` is C++-mangled
as `CppClass* &`.
Hi!
Reading through the `getopt` documentation at one point it says:
"Forms such as -t 5 and -timeout=5 will be not accepted."
But I'm able to to use short options like '-t 5' (with spaces
between the 't' and the '5'). It seems that this limitation has
been eliminated and it just-works-now,
On Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 13:42:43 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 13:13:40 UTC, bauss wrote:
Well unfortunately I cannot control the C++ side of things,
but I assume that it'll work properly with extern(C++) so I
guess I will just go ahead and try and see
On Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 21:58:16 UTC, kinke wrote:
You're not using naked asm; this entails a prologue (spilling
the params to stack etc.). Additionally, LDC doesn't really
like accessing params and locals in DMD-style inline asm, see
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/2854.
On 11/29/18 2:07 AM, unDEFER wrote:
No I'm not preallocating any exceptions. It was idea, but I removed all
calls which can make throw.
I'm using very old dmd 2.074.1, so as I have patched it for my text
editor with IDE functions. I had a year break in development, so now I
need to rewrite all
On Thursday, 29 November 2018 at 13:42:28 UTC, greatsam4sure
wrote:
Which class in dlangui is use to obtain the screen height and
width?
A Windom of dimension 280 x 445 in dlangui is the same as a
Windom of 350 x 550 in Javafx and adobe air.
What could be responsible for this wide difference?
On Thursday, 29 November 2018 at 05:54:37 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 23:07:50 UTC, greatsam4sure
wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 17:23:21 UTC, Edgar Huckert
wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 08:55:11 UTC, greatsam4sure
wrote:
[...]
For a little bit of
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:10 AM Murilo via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I am using the function pow() from std.math but if I try pow(2,
> 32) it returns 0, it doesn't compute beyond the maximum value of
> an int(2^31) and I am working with long. What should I d
On Thursday, 29 November 2018 at 07:07:06 UTC, Murilo wrote:
I am using the function pow() from std.math but if I try pow(2,
32) it returns 0, it doesn't compute beyond the maximum value
of an int(2^31) and I am working with long. What should I do?
what exactly is your input?
´´´
import std.s
21 matches
Mail list logo
