I've been working through the ideas of a project I'd like to work
on and I've reached the point where I'm having trouble choosing a
toolset. I'd like to make a graphically simple, mostly menu
driven 2d simulation type game, but I'd like it to at least be
compatible with android.
I've used D
On Tuesday, 20 April 2021 at 19:56:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I have had the need in some cases to *maybe* set a const value
inside a loop. One can sometimes abstract this into a lambda
function, but sometimes this is not possible (e.g. if the loop
is static). Not only that, but I may
On Monday, 19 April 2021 at 18:32:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 19 April 2021 at 18:05:46 UTC, cc wrote:
This seems to work if I flush after every printf or write in
both main and the dll. I was under the impression they were
supposed to share the same IO buffers though, is this not
On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 13:39:54 UTC, JN wrote:
struct Foo
{
int x, y, z;
}
void main()
{
Foo bar = Foo(1,);
}
This compiles without syntax errors, is this expected?
Yes, the
On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 13:39:54 UTC, JN wrote:
struct Foo
{
int x, y, z;
}
void main()
{
Foo bar = Foo(1,);
}
This compiles without syntax errors, is this expected?
Yes, D allows trailing commas in argument lists.
struct Foo
{
int x, y, z;
}
void main()
{
Foo bar = Foo(1,);
}
This compiles without syntax errors, is this expected?
On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 12:54:43 UTC, Jack wrote:
I find out this later. I give up trying to get this in
automatic way at compile time
That's because the type might not be known at compile time at
all, it might come from like a plugin loaded at run time and only
ever accessed through the
On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 08:36:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 03:45:13 UTC, Jack wrote:
that's better, thanks
Imporant to remember that any compile time thing will be the
static type. If someone does:
Base a = new Derived();
a.something();
it will still show
On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 03:45:13 UTC, Jack wrote:
that's better, thanks
Imporant to remember that any compile time thing will be the
static type. If someone does:
Base a = new Derived();
a.something();
it will still show up as Base in the this template. The knowledge
that it is
On Saturday, 24 April 2021 at 16:48:49 UTC, Ishax wrote:
Yet the .exe functions if I supply it with .dlls. Thats silly.
That's because you're linking with the import library. On
Windows, static libraries and import libraries both have the
`.lib` extension. The SDL development packages on the
On Saturday, 24 April 2021 at 16:13:12 UTC, russhy wrote:
also you are missing the
```
subConfigurations "bindbc-sdl" "staticBC"
```
That's not necessary when the version `BindSDL_Static` is
provided. The `static` and `staticBC` subconfigurations both
enable `-version=BindSDL_Static`,
11 matches
Mail list logo
