On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 03:05:24 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 01:45:27 UTC, SealabJaster wrote:
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 01:26:25 UTC, someone wrote:
...
Not 100% sure this works in all cases, but this version
doesn't need the caller to make use of a mixin:
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 03:51:02 UTC, SealabJaster wrote:
...
There's also Ali Cehreli's book, which is excellent.
e.g. here's the section on UDAs:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/uda.html
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 01:56:21 UTC, someone wrote:
...
Prepare yourself, as you may become a metaprogramming junkie in
the near future.
Throw in `static if`[0] `static foreach`[1] `string mixin()`[2]
`CTFE`[3] and make some crazy, random, arcane mess of fun
spaghetti.
I've wrote
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 03:05:24 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
...
Yea, that's true.
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 01:45:27 UTC, SealabJaster wrote:
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 01:26:25 UTC, someone wrote:
...
Not 100% sure this works in all cases, but this version doesn't
need the caller to make use of a mixin:
https://run.dlang.io/is/3jLxLz
If you only need to print
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 01:45:27 UTC, SealabJaster wrote:
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 01:26:25 UTC, someone wrote:
...
Not 100% sure this works in all cases, but this version doesn't
need the caller to make use of a mixin:
https://run.dlang.io/is/3jLxLz
http://dlang.org/traits.html ...
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 01:26:25 UTC, someone wrote:
...
Not 100% sure this works in all cases, but this version doesn't
need the caller to make use of a mixin:
https://run.dlang.io/is/3jLxLz
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:48:53 UTC, Vindex wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:31:24 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:28:07 UTC, Vindex wrote:
Error: file "thing.json" cannot be found or not in a path
specified with -J
You need to specify the path where it is
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 00:52:39 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
The closest you can get is to use a string mixin:
```d
enum debugWriteln(string expression) =
`writeln(q"(` ~ expression ~ `)", " = ", ` ~ expression ~
`);`;
// Usage:
mixin(debugWriteln!"lobjExchanges.count");
```
clever :)
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 00:07:25 UTC, someone wrote:
Every time I use it, of course, I have to double-type the tag
and the value. I wonder if there's some mechanism to just type
the following:
```d
debugwriteln(lobjExchanges.count);
```
... and some way to get the identifier of what's
I know the answer for this will be a resoundingly no, but, anyway
...
I have, more-or-less, the following function:
```d
public void debugwriteln(typeValue)(
const dstring lstrTag,
const typeValue lstrValue
) {
writeln(console.colorizeYellow(r"debugging"d), r" → "d,
lstrTag,
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 18:48:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 18:47:50 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:45:05 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 16:32:46 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
[...]
Thanks.
Indeed that seems to work even when
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:45:05 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 16:32:46 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
[...]
Thanks.
Indeed that seems to work even when inline and optimized.
Registers are spilled to stack.
A minor concern is what happens when the enclosing function is
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 18:47:50 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:45:05 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 16:32:46 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
[...]
Thanks.
Indeed that seems to work even when inline and optimized.
Registers are spilled to stack.
A
On 7/18/21 10:28 AM, Vindex wrote:
> ```
> ldc2 source/main.d -ofmyprogram -L-l:libmylib.so.0
> Error: file "thing.json" cannot be found or not in a path specified
with -J
> ```
>
> Is the actual inclusion of the file on import deferred until the link
step?
I wonder whether it's an ldc
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:31:24 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:28:07 UTC, Vindex wrote:
Error: file "thing.json" cannot be found or not in a path
specified with -J
You need to specify the path where it is found with the -J
switch to the compiler. Like `ldc2 -J.
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 16:32:46 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Yeah I can confirm it's aweful. Took me hours to understand how
to use it a bit (my PL has [an
interface](https://styx-lang.gitlab.io/styx/primary_expressions.html#asmexpression) for LLVM asm)
You need to add a "x" to the constraint
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:31:24 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:28:07 UTC, Vindex wrote:
Error: file "thing.json" cannot be found or not in a path
specified with -J
You need to specify the path where it is found with the -J
switch to the compiler. Like `ldc2 -J.
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:28:07 UTC, Vindex wrote:
Error: file "thing.json" cannot be found or not in a path
specified with -J
You need to specify the path where it is found with the -J switch
to the compiler. Like `ldc2 -J. yourfile.d
One of my library modules (for example, libmylib) has the line
`immutable string jsonText = import("thing.json")`
When I try to build a program with this (already installed)
library I see error
```
ldc2 source/main.d -ofmyprogram -L-l:libmylib.so.0
Error: file "thing.json" cannot be found
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 11:42:24 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
Is anyone versed in LLVM inline asm?
I know how to generate SIMD unary op with:
return __asm!int4("pmovsxwd $1,$0","=x,x",a);
but I struggle to generate 2-operands SIMD ops like:
return __asm!int4("paddd
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 11:04:55 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 03:52:30 UTC, someone wrote:
That being said, one of the things that I felt in love with
when I was first exposed to was OOP; with all its pros and
cons.
Yeah I like a lot about OOP and D's implementation
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 11:03:24 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
Fun fact there: any child implementations do NOT need to
specify the attribute there; the compiler will copy it from the
interface for you.
I suppose these are the day-to-day minor details you can rely on
to avoid typing a lot of
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 10:02:07 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 17.07.21 15:56, ag0aep6g wrote:
+1.
IMO,`strong pure` is `the outside world` has no impact on me.
`Funcs` don't have any `indirect`.
Is anyone versed in LLVM inline asm?
I know how to generate SIMD unary op with:
return __asm!int4("pmovsxwd $1,$0","=x,x",a);
but I struggle to generate 2-operands SIMD ops like:
return __asm!int4("paddd $1,$0","=x,x",a, b);
If you know how to do it =>
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 03:27:04 UTC, someone wrote:
I have an interface with function members *not* being declared
@safe (at first glance it seemed irrelevant to me just to mark
@safe a declaration and not an actual implementation).
Yeah, that'd be promising all child implementations are
On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 03:52:30 UTC, someone wrote:
That being said, one of the things that I felt in love with
when I was first exposed to was OOP; with all its pros and cons.
Yeah I like a lot about OOP and D's implementation is one of the
nicest out there. Very competent implementation
On 17.07.21 15:56, ag0aep6g wrote:
At a glance, the only meaningful use of `PURE.strong` seems to be in
dcast.d, introduced by the PR you linked. Changing that to `PURE.const_`
doesn't break any tests for me. So I'm inclined to believe that
`PURE.strong` is nonsense, and that `PURE.const_`
28 matches
Mail list logo
