On Saturday, 3 December 2022 at 18:59:58 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
```
dub build --compiler=ldc2 --arch=arm64-apple-macos
Starting Performing "debug" build using ldc2 for aarch64,
arm_hardfloat.
Building taggedalgebraic 0.11.22: building configuration
[library]
Building eventcore
On Monday, 12 December 2022 at 17:23:36 UTC, lili wrote:
```
int[string] aa = ["ok":1, "aaa":2, "ccc":3, "ddd":4];
foreach (k ; aa.byKey)
{
if (k == "aaa") {
aa.remove(k);
aa["ww"] = 33;
}
if (k ==
On Wednesday, 14 December 2022 at 11:30:07 UTC, Vitaliy Fadeev
wrote:
Hi! I open a device under Windows:
```
HANDLE h = CreateFileW( ... );
```
in procedure:
```
HANDLE open_keyboard_device2( LPCWSTR path, int* error_number )
{
...
HANDLE dev_handle =
CreateFileW(
On Saturday, 17 December 2022 at 02:42:22 UTC, Paul wrote:
I see code like this from time to time. Are the leading
underscores significant, in general, in the D language? Is it
just programmer preference? Is it a coding practice, in
general, that is common...even outside of D? Thanks for
On Saturday, 17 December 2022 at 00:23:32 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
I am reading the fantastic book about D by Ali Çehreli, and he
gives the following example when he talks about variadic
functions:
```D
int[] numbersForLaterUse;
void foo(int[] numbers...) {
numbersForLaterUse =
On Monday, 12 December 2022 at 15:03:13 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 12 December 2022 at 11:17:47 UTC, jni wrote:
It's good. But you did the java bindings by hand or is there a
generator in arsd.jni for that too?
It does it automatically. You compile jni.d with
On Saturday, 17 December 2022 at 02:42:22 UTC, Paul wrote:
Are the leading underscores significant, in general, in the D
language?
The code you linked is a copy/paste from some C runtime library
code, where the leading __ is the convention to indicate it is
part of the private platform
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 02:36:10AM +, thebluepandabear via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> Thanks, I've tried to mark it with `@safe` and it did give me a
> warning.
>
> I was also wondering, why is this code valid?
>
> ```D
> int[] numbersForLaterUse;
>
> @safe void foo(int[] numbers)
