Re: Toolchain with ldc and AArch64 OSX
On Saturday, 24 June 2023 at 15:16:37 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have LDC running on an ARM Mac. If anyone else out there is
an LDC or GDC user, could you knock up a quick shell program to
compile and link a .d file to produce an executable ? found the
linker but these tools are all new to me and a bit of help
would save me a lot of trial and error and frustration as I try
to find docs. GDC would be great too.
I have managed to achieve this before on a Raspberry Pi AArch64
Linux Debian where the compiler can link and generate an
executable just in integrated fashion in the one command. The
OSX tools seem rather different however.
```d
import std.stdio : writeln;
void main() {
writeln("Hello, world!");
}
```
Compilation using LDC on macOS is just:
```
ldc2 --release --O3 main.d
```
Or some more options, to reduce executable size:
```
ldc2 --release --O3 --flto=full -fvisibility=hidden
-defaultlib=phobos2-ldc-lto,druntime-ldc-lto -L=-dead_strip -L=-x
-L=-S -L=-lz main.d
```
Executable size using first command: 1.3MB
Executable size using second command: 756KB
Re: Dynamic array of strings and appending a zero length array
On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 05:15:26PM +, Cecil Ward via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > I have a dynamic array of dstrings and I’m spending dstrings to it. At > one point I need to append a zero-length string just to increase the > length of the array by one but I can’t have a slot containing garbage. > I thought about ++arr.length - would that work, while giving me valid > contents to the final slot ? Unlike C/C++, the D runtime always ensures that things are initialized unless you explicitly tell it not to (via void-initialization). So ++arr.length will work; the new element will be initialized to dstring.init (which is the empty string). T -- If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution. -- Robert Sewell
Re: Dynamic array of strings and appending a zero length array
On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 17:15:26 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote: I have a dynamic array of dstrings and I’m spending dstrings to it. At one point I need to append a zero-length string just to increase the length of the array by one but I can’t have a slot containing garbage. I thought about ++arr.length - would that work, while giving me valid contents to the final slot ? What I first did was arr ~= []; This gave no errors but it doesn’t increase the array length, so it seems. Is that a bug ? Or is it supposed to do that? You can append an element to an array. You can also append an array to an array. Because [] can be an array of any type, the compiler guesses that it's an empty `string[]` array and appends it to no effect.
Re: Dynamic array of strings and appending a zero length array
On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 17:15:26 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote: I have a dynamic array of dstrings and I’m spending dstrings to it. At one point I need to append a zero-length string just to increase the length of the array by one but I can’t have a slot containing garbage. I thought about ++arr.length - would that work, while giving me valid contents to the final slot ? [...] s/spending/appending/
Dynamic array of strings and appending a zero length array
I have a dynamic array of dstrings and I’m spending dstrings to it. At one point I need to append a zero-length string just to increase the length of the array by one but I can’t have a slot containing garbage. I thought about ++arr.length - would that work, while giving me valid contents to the final slot ? What I first did was arr ~= []; This gave no errors but it doesn’t increase the array length, so it seems. Is that a bug ? Or is it supposed to do that? Then I tried arr ~= ""d; and that did work. Is there anything more efficient that I could do instead? I actually have an alias for the type of the strings so that they can be either dstrings or wstrings with just a recompilation. How should I then generate a zero-length string that has th correct type of dstring or wstring as I am stuck with the ‘d’-suffix on the end of the ""d at the moment. Can I just cast ? Not a reinterpret cast, but a proper value conversion?
