Given that gcc v9 should have built-in support for compiling D
code, and that dmd requires gcc, will dmd continue to be
supported? Or perhaps have its guts incorporated completely into
gcc?
On Saturday, 16 July 2016 at 20:22:15 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 14 July 2016 at 10:13:38 UTC, dom wrote:
On Thursday, 14 July 2016 at 00:33:50 UTC, ethgeh wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 July 2016 at 19:41:53 UTC, dom wrote:
how can i run my unittests for a dynamic library? some weird
conflict is
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 01:31:12 UTC, mawk wrote:
On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 00:43:59 UTC, Andrew Pennebaker
wrote:
Given that gcc v9 should have built-in support for compiling D
code, and that dmd requires gcc, will dmd continue to be
supported? Or perhaps have its guts
I think it's lame to have to use magical code like
`version(unittest) {} else` to guard our main functions, when we
run unit tests. Could D go ahead and do the right thing,
automatically shadowing our main functions when the unit tests
are run?
On Monday, 3 November 2008 at 12:29:16 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:33:05 +0100, Denis Koroskin
<2kor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:11:20 +0300, Daniel Ribeiro Maciel
wrote:
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:59:56 +0300, Daniel Ribeiro
