Hello everyone,
Am looking for someone who could help review my code . As an
entry exercise to D am converting 3 C implementations of popular
pattern matching algorithms. The idea is to have 6 final
implementations ( 3 compile-time and 3 runtime) . I think am
basically done with the
On Wednesday, 12 August 2015 at 13:14:04 UTC, sigod wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 August 2015 at 22:50:52 UTC, Clayton wrote:
Hello everyone,
Am looking for someone who could help review my code . As an
entry exercise to D am converting 3 C implementations of
popular pattern matching algorithms.
On Wednesday, 12 August 2015 at 12:14:20 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 13/08/2015 12:09 a.m., Clayton wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 August 2015 at 02:49:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 12/08/2015 10:50 a.m., Clayton wrote:
[...]
Upload to e.g. Github/gist/pastebin.
Hi Rikki, can I have
On Wednesday, 12 August 2015 at 02:49:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 12/08/2015 10:50 a.m., Clayton wrote:
Hello everyone,
Am looking for someone who could help review my code . As an
entry
exercise to D am converting 3 C implementations of popular
pattern
matching algorithms. The idea
On Wednesday, 22 July 2015 at 09:32:15 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 July 2015 at 09:23:36 UTC, Clayton wrote:
[...]
The normal way of doing this would be using
std.datetime.StopWatch:
StopWatch sw;
sw.start();
algorithm();
long exec_ms = sw.peek().msecs;
Much
How does one represent Duration in only Micro-seconds, or
milliseconds. Trying to measure the execution time of an
algorithm and I get 4 ms, 619 μs, and 8 hnsecs , I want to sum
all these and get total hnsecs or μs .
I would also appreciate advise on whether this is the best way
to measure
On Wednesday, 22 July 2015 at 09:32:15 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 July 2015 at 09:23:36 UTC, Clayton wrote:
[...]
The normal way of doing this would be using
std.datetime.StopWatch:
StopWatch sw;
sw.start();
algorithm();
long exec_ms = sw.peek().msecs;
Am
Am new to D programming, am considering it since it supports
compile-time function execution . My challenge is how can I
re-implement the function below so that it is fully executed in
compile-time. The function should result to tabel1 being computed
at compile-time. There seems to be a lot of
On Saturday, 18 July 2015 at 16:01:25 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Saturday, 18 July 2015 at 13:48:20 UTC, Clayton wrote:
[...]
[...]
change function signature to
int[char] function(string) or as the char type is the index
probably better of as
int[256] function(string). also probably
On Saturday, 18 July 2015 at 13:56:36 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 18 July 2015 at 13:48:20 UTC, Clayton wrote:
There seems to be a lot of mutation happening here yet I have
heard no mutation should take place in meta-programming as it
subscribes to functional programming paradigm.
Pardon me for trivial question, Am new to D.
Why would a statement as below fail to compile. The plan is to do
some computation at compile-time hence considering the static-if
statement which fails to compile. The regular if-statement
compiles but is not useful since it is a runtime
What could be the best-tool for monitoring the evaluation time of
a variable . What I usually do is run the command :-
- dmd -J. program.d
Then I inspect the program.o file using vi for presence of
compile-time constants and enums. I am wondering if this is the
right way to do this. Am a bit
On Monday, 20 July 2015 at 09:29:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 20 July 2015 at 08:53:52 UTC, Clayton wrote:
[...]
You mean you want to know if some value is pre-computed during
compilation?
[...]
Thankyou a lot for the suggestion. Am noting as I learn the
language.
On Monday, 20 July 2015 at 10:11:10 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 20 July 2015 at 08:53:52 UTC, Clayton wrote:
[...]
I'm not sure that's what you want to know, but...
The evaluation time of expressions is completely deterministic.
Global (module level) or static variables, default
On Monday, 13 May 2019 at 09:56:19 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Monday, 13 May 2019 at 09:24:34 UTC, Doug Clayton wrote:
[...]
You don't need to cast it, arrays have .ptr property to get
pointer to first element, and in @safe you just [0]
instead, or so I think.
If you are using static/literal
Hi All,
First time poster :)
I'm working on getting a binding to Vulkan working properly in D,
but I've run into a roadblock. The good news is that the binding
seems to work fine, but I'm having an issue getting a parameter
that needs an input of a const(char*)* to receive all of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
