It's because arrays are references types, and .dup is a strictly
shallow copy, so you're getting two outer arrays that reference
the same set of inner arrays. You'll have to duplicated each of
the inner arrays yourself if you need to make a deep copy.
On Friday, 8 May 2015 at 02:15:38 UTC, Dennis
I'm putting together a program that uses std.concurrency to
handle two child threads from the main thread;
The kicker here is that both the children do very different
things. And I would like to handle receive() calls for them in
separate locations. But from what I can tell, each thread has
o
On Friday, 10 July 2015 at 23:39:30 UTC, ketmar wrote:
this way your `receive` will get all messages. simply do
nothing in `Variant` handler to drop messages you don't want to
process.
[1] http://dlang.org/phobos/std_concurrency.html#.receive
The thing is, I want to do receive() in two sepa
On Saturday, 11 July 2015 at 02:15:02 UTC, ketmar wrote:
so simply don't receive the messages you don't need right now.
as i said, `receive()` doesn't look to top message only, it
scans the whole mailbox, trying to find a message that matches.
you can use `receiveTimeout()` to do nothing if t
On Saturday, 18 July 2015 at 13:48:20 UTC, Clayton wrote:
Am new to D programming, am considering it since it supports
compile-time function execution . My challenge is how can I
re-implement the function below so that it is fully executed in
compile-time. The function should result to tabel1 b
