On Wednesday, 2 January 2019 at 17:49:52 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 05:38:41PM +, IM via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
1- How do I do in D the equivalent of the following C++ macro?
#define OUT_VAL(val) (count << #val << " = " << val << e
On Wednesday, 2 January 2019 at 21:56:03 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/2/19 12:38 PM, IM wrote:
[...]
With those ... I have to guess.
There are 2 possibilities.
Possibility 1: there is a method named 'doSomeWork' which takes
at least one parameter. This overrides the UFCS function
1- How do I do in D the equivalent of the following C++ macro?
#define OUT_VAL(val) (count << #val << " = " << val << endl)
In particular the #val above to the actual macro argument as a
string?
2- Yesterday I was experimenting with something and I wrote
something like the following:
On Monday, 15 October 2018 at 03:33:04 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 15 October 2018 at 03:19:07 UTC, IM wrote:
I probably used to know the answer to this question, but it's
been a long time since I last used D, and I don't remember.
Suppose we have:
struct S {
int num;
}
Would
I probably used to know the answer to this question, but it's
been a long time since I last used D, and I don't remember.
Suppose we have:
struct S {
int num;
}
Would allocating an instance on the heap using:
S* s = new S;
use the GC, or do we have to call destroy() or delete on s
The following expression:
import std.math : sqrt;
sqrt(400);
produces the following compiler error:
std.math.sqrt called with argument types (int) matches both:
/usr/include/dmd/phobos/std/math.d(1592,7):
std.math.sqrt(float x)
and:
/usr/include/dmd/phobos/std/math.d(1598,6):
On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 23:16:54 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/06/2017 03:01 PM, IM wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 07:54:21 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
>> On 12/05/2017 11:23 PM, IM wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Just remove the override keywords in this case. No function
is
>>
On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 07:54:21 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/05/2017 11:23 PM, IM wrote:
[...]
Just remove the override keywords in this case. No function is
overriding any implementation here, they both implement an
interface function. The fact that override can be used for
Assume the following:
interface IFace {
void foo();
void bar();
}
abstract class A : IFace {
override void foo() {}
}
class B : A {
override void bar() {}
}
Now why this fails to compiler with the following message:
--->>>
function bar does not override any function, did you mean to
