On Sunday, 17 August 2025 at 01:24:51 UTC, Monkyyy wrote:
I don't think you should attempt to port a python data
structure 1 to 1. I'd like to see a smarter data structure I'd
suggest figuring out smarter filtering on statictyped data.
There's hard problems before mimicking a dymanic language
On Sunday, 17 August 2025 at 08:38:53 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
I forgot to mention - if I was to implement dataframes, I would
read polars code, and check how they did it.
For me the most important feature would be how nicely it fits
into the rest of the D ecosystem. Implementation of dataframe
On Friday, 15 August 2025 at 17:51:50 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Friday, 15 August 2025 at 17:38:53 UTC, Marc wrote:
Hello,
In my typed data frames I've this type of code. It works for
default value (float) but I can't call `opIndex!double[i, j]`
or `opIndex!string[i,j]`.
You need to writ
Hello,
In my typed data frames I've this type of code. It works for
default value (float) but I can't call `opIndex!double[i, j]` or
`opIndex!string[i,j]`. It just doesn't work and I get the error
`is not a template declaration, it is a variable`.
```d
// Overload [i, j]
ref T opIndex(T = flo
On Friday, 15 August 2025 at 21:09:50 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>
> Any help would be really appreciated.
This design doesn't seem useful. How about something like the
following:
import std.conv : to;
x[i, j].to!double;
y[i, j].to!float;
Ali
Thanks a lot for your reply. It should be
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
