I am a volunteer developer with the well-known 3D CAD FOSS project BRL-CAD:
http://brlcad.org
I have wanted to use D for a long time but I hadn't taken the plunge.
Yesterday I advertised to the BRL-CAD community my new project to
attempt to create D bindings for BRL-CAD's C libraries, and I cre
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Craig Dillabaugh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 01:16:46 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
>> On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 22:25:47 UTC, Tom Browder via
>> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
...
>>> What I have not seen yet i
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:56 PM, FrankLike via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
...
> And use VisualD.
Thanks for the suggestion, Frank, but I don't do windows.
Best,
-Tom
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Jacob Carlborg via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
...
> On 15/05/14 23:27, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
...
>> I have been looking for specific information on creating D bindings
>> from C headers for which there seems to be suffici
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Alex Herrmann via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 10:10:17 UTC, Tom Browder via
...
>> Thanks for the suggestion, Frank, but I don't do windows.
...
> Monodevelop (open source C# dev platform) has a plugin for D by
...
Thanks for the suggest
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Gary Willoughby via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 22:25:47 UTC, Tom Browder via
..
>> What I have not seen yet is the exact way to build a D program which
>> uses D bindings and its matching C library. I have just created a
...
> For a s
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Gary Willoughby via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
...
> Then take a look at one of my projects in which i've ported C headers to D.
>
> https://github.com/nomad-software/tcltk
I notice your binding source files have a ".d" suffix. Is that the
preferred convention?
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Gary Willoughby via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 19:17:05 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Using .di is more idiomatic as those are supposed to denote
>> declaration-only interface files (with no implementation). In practice it
>> makes almost no di
I know I'm supposed to use dub, but I'm not ready.
I just found out I can't use dmd switches for file names variable in a
GNU makefile, e.g., see this fragment
%.o : %.d
dmd -c $< -of $@
which doesn't work because the "-of" must be followed immediately by a
file name with no intervening sp
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 8:05 AM, via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Saturday, 17 May 2014 at 13:01:07 UTC, Tom Browder via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
...
>> I just found out I can't use dmd switches for file names variable in a
>> GNU makefile, e.g., see this fragm
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Mengu via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 18:19:45 UTC, Alex Herrmann wrote:
...
>> integrates okay with dub too. There is also an emacs major mode
>> for d (d-mode) which gives basic highlighting and indentation
>> too. I use both all of the
I am working on a project to provide D binding files for the C/C++
FOSS BRL-CAD project:
http://brlcad.org
My work is on the "d-binding" branch and specifically here:
http://sourceforge.net/p/brlcad/code/HEAD/tree/brlcad/branches/d-binding/misc/d-bindings/
My plan is to automatically gene
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Rikki Cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 20/05/2014 10:36 p.m., Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
>> I am working on a project to provide D binding files for the C/C++
>> FOSS BRL-CAD project:
...
>> (also with sub-dirs
Given a single ddoc source file (with no D source), how can one
generate the default html output?
I have tried: dmd -D -main ddoc.ddoc
and get nothing except __main.* files with no documentation.
Do I have to use CanDyDoc or bootDoc? They seem like overkill for a
first effort.
Thanks.
-Tom
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> Given a single ddoc source file (with no D source), how can one
> generate the default html output?
I solved the problem by starting with the build system for the D lang
web site here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org
So
I haven't found a detailed description of simple aliases. TPDL shows
aliases of this form:
alias TYPE NAME;
with some complex examples of D types aliased to a simpler name.
The D lang web site language reference says nothing about aliases
(except as it's described in the grammar), and the D l
This will not compile:
alias blah = null;
The dmd message are:
di/test_hdr.d(10): Error: basic type expected, not null
di/test_hdr.d(10): Error: semicolon expected to close alias declaration
di/test_hdr.d(10): Error: Declaration expected, not 'null'
Are there any other objects that cannot be
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:42 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 03:26:13PM -0500, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
>> This will not compile:
>>
>> alias blah = null;
> [...]
>
> 'null' is a value, not a
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
> On 06/12/2014 02:06 PM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
...
>> What I was really trying to do was D'ify C expressions like this:
>>
>>typedef ((struct t*)0) blah;
...
>> So, taking your advice, I
I built dstep from this repo on a Debian Linux 64-bit system (after
building and installing the dmd suite from its repos).
But I'm having problems using it.
Given a file t.h with sole contents:
extern const char *const sys_errlist[];
I run dstep on it and get a core dump:
$ dstep -x c -o t.d
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> since null is a value maybe you want
>
> enum blah = null;
That works.
> you may also give it a type after the enum word
But I can't get any other variant to work so far.
-Tom
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> confirmed and commmented in that issue
Thank you! That makes me feel better, but I guess Jacob has a valid
bug on his hands. It will be interesting to see the fix.
Best regards,
-Tom
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:59 AM, via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 June 2014 at 21:07:47 UTC, Tom Browder via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
>>
>> What I was really trying to do was D'ify C expressions like this:
>>
>> typedef ((struct t*)0) blah
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, monarch_dodra via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 15:05:49 UTC, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
>>
>> So I'm not sure how to translate that into D. I do know my first
>> attempt here doe
24 matches
Mail list logo
