On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 04:58:52 UTC, Kaitlyn Emmons wrote:
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 04:50:12 UTC, Kaitlyn Emmons wrote:
Is it possible on windows to dynamically size fibers?
follow up question, if i allocate way more space for a bunch of
fibers then they need, will the space just get
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 06:56:14 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 05:21:14 UTC, Crayo List wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 18:52:16 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
[snip]
(on the downside you have to guard against compiler code-gen
performance regressions)
auto
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 18:52:16 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
When speeds are equivalent, or very close, I usually prefer
auto vectorized code to explicit SIMD/__vector code as it's
easier to read. (on the downside you have to guard against
compiler code-gen performance regressions)
One
On Tuesday, 11 December 2018 at 01:37:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2018 at 23:20:22 UTC, Crayo List wrote:
Are there atomic equivalents of bt(), btc(), bts(), btr() ...
etc from core.bitop?
Those are intrinsics that compile into a single cpu
instruction, so they are
Are there atomic equivalents of bt(), btc(), bts(), btr() ... etc
from core.bitop?
Thanks
