On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 01:24:21 UTC, A Guy With a
Question wrote:
I was just more curious of the design decisions that were made.
So am I. I'm trying to get to the heart of in the the PR
comments.
Mike
On Monday, 27 November 2017 at 23:05:55 UTC, Michael V. Franklin
wrote:
I think I'm going to implement a feature gate to require
explicit initialization. It would be better to be strict up
front and relax it as flow control analysis becomes more mature.
Well, I implemented it
On Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 22:13:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
It technically did:
https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#local-variables
"It is an error to use a local variable without first assigning
it a value. The implementation may not always be able to detect
these cases. Other
On Tuesday, 21 November 2017 at 10:04:50 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
File a bug report and try contacting Martin Nowak, as he's the
author of this test, IIRC.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18013
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 15:10:40 UTC, Oleg B wrote:
import core.stdc.stdio;
import std.algorithm : min;
extern (C) void main()
{
char[256] buf;
buf[] = '\0';
auto str = "hello world";
auto ln = min(buf.length, str.length);
buf[0..ln] = str[0..ln];
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 00:58:21 UTC, Marc wrote:
for example:
enum A { a = -10, b = -11, c = -12, d = -13, e = -34}
enum int countOfA = coutOfFields(A); // 5 fields
https://dlang.org/spec/traits.html#allMembers
enum A { a = -10, b = -11, c = -12, d = -13, e = -34}
enum int
I'm getting this error when I try to run the DMD test suite.
cd dmd
make -C test -f Makefile
... runnable/test_cdvecfill.d -O (-mcpu=avx -mcpu=avx2)
Test failed. The logged output:
../src/dmd -conf= -m64 -Irunnable -O -odtest_results/runnable
-oftest_results/runnable/test_cdvecfill_0
On Friday, 17 November 2017 at 02:13:54 UTC, matthewh wrote:
[...]
as is it produces:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
[]
I expected it to produce:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
And with the toString override included it does.
Why does the version without the toString override
On Friday, 17 November 2017 at 02:16:35 UTC, Michael V. Franklin
wrote:
On Friday, 17 November 2017 at 02:13:54 UTC, matthewh wrote:
And with the toString override included it does.
Why does the version without the toString override output an
empty array?
I think that is due to this bug:
On Friday, 17 November 2017 at 02:13:54 UTC, matthewh wrote:
And with the toString override included it does.
Why does the version without the toString override output an
empty array?
I think that is due to this bug:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13189
It's actually on my todo
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 06:22:51 UTC, Tony wrote:
Doing a port of some C code that has an #ifdef in the middle of
an initialization for an array of structs. I am getting a
compile error trying to get equivalent behavior with "static
if" or "version". Is there a way to achieve this other
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 05:54:00 UTC, Michael V. Franklin
wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 03:40:23 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
Is there a magic visible sign (or even one needed) in the D
language that tells D _compilers_ not to move certain types of
memory load / store operations
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 03:40:23 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
Is there a magic visible sign (or even one needed) in the D
language that tells D _compilers_ not to move certain types of
memory load / store operations forwards or backwards relative
to other operations when optimising the code
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 20:53:44 UTC, Dr. Assembly wrote:
Hey guys, if I were to get into dmd's source code to play a
little bit (just for fun, no commercial use at all), which
books/resources do you recommend to start out?
I found this to be quite helpful:
On Monday, 16 October 2017 at 03:29:03 UTC, Michael V. Franklin
wrote:
My experience says that BountySource almost doesn't help.
It works if the bounty is worth someone sacrificing their free
time to do the work. For example, I'd attempt fixing the bug
if the bounty were greater than
On Friday, 13 October 2017 at 11:54:38 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
On Friday, 13 October 2017 at 11:21:48 UTC, Biotronic wrote:
BountySource[2] lets you do basically exactly that.
My experience says that BountySource almost doesn't help.
It works if the bounty is worth someone sacrificing
16 matches
Mail list logo
