On Tuesday, 2 August 2016 at 20:28:51 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 August 2016 at 18:34:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/2/16 2:25 PM, Rufus Smith wrote:
So, something funky is going on. Any ideas?
phobos is not being resolved.
I don't use visualD, so I'm not sure what the
On Tuesday, 2 August 2016 at 18:34:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/2/16 2:25 PM, Rufus Smith wrote:
So, something funky is going on. Any ideas?
phobos is not being resolved.
I don't use visualD, so I'm not sure what the issue is, it's
probably a compiler or linker ordering issue.
On Tuesday, 2 August 2016 at 17:25:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/2/16 1:04 PM, Rufus Smith wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 August 2016 at 16:30:08 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 August 2016 at 16:21:07 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
How does one use C main? extern C?
extern(C) int main()
On Tuesday, 2 August 2016 at 16:30:08 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 August 2016 at 16:21:07 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
How does one use C main? extern C?
extern(C) int main()
should do it
It doesn't seem to be that easy!
https://wiki.dlang.org/Runtime_internals
If I do this then I
On Tuesday, 2 August 2016 at 11:37:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/1/16 9:24 PM, Rufus Smith wrote:
Can one add code that executes before the GC and any memory is
normally
allocated(even static) and after all of it was suppose to be
released?
Of course! You just have to modify drunti
Can one add code that executes before the GC and any memory is
normally allocated(even static) and after all of it was suppose
to be released?
A sort of static this for the whole app. I would like to monitor
the memory of the app to make sure that the total memory before
and after is equal. I
On Monday, 25 July 2016 at 12:24:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/23/16 5:44 PM, Rufus Smith wrote:
[...]
Again, I want to stress that Object.opEquals has been around
since early D1 days, @nogc is only a few years old, it was not
a wrong decision. @nogc cannot be added without breaki
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 13:18:03 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
Trying to compare a *ptr value with a value in nogc code
results in the error:
Error: @nogc function '...' cannot call non-@nogc function
'object.opEquals'
Shouldn't object opEquals be marked?
So, I need to compare two objects
NM, ignore. Seems it was something else going on. Although, if
you know how how dmd resolves this stuff exactly, it would be
nice to know. Does it just use the module names regardless of
path or does the path where the module is located have any
play(assuming they are properly passed to the com
How do module names and actual folder paths relate?
For my own libraries, I use the file path as module name, more or
less.
e.g.,
module foo.bar.x;
is in folder foo\bar.
I imported some external lib that has it's own layout, but I
wanted to incorporate it in to my lib, so I stuck it in a s
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 22:48:07 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 21:44:05 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 17:27:24 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
- we trust what we are doing: e.g. we cannot mark a thing
@nogc, but we know it is and the pr
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 17:27:24 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 17:04:42 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 16:46:20 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
[...]
Actually Im going to disagree with myself. This technique
actually wouldn't work with
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 17:23:37 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Sat, 23 Jul 2016 13:18:03 +
schrieb Rufus Smith :
Trying to compare a *ptr value with a value in nogc code
results in the error:
Error: @nogc function '...' cannot call non-@nogc function
'object.opEquals'
Shouldn't object
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 14:15:03 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 13:18:03 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
Trying to compare a *ptr value with a value in nogc code
results in the error:
Error: @nogc function '...' cannot call non-@nogc function
'object.opEquals'
Sho
Trying to compare a *ptr value with a value in nogc code results
in the error:
Error: @nogc function '...' cannot call non-@nogc function
'object.opEquals'
Shouldn't object opEquals be marked?
On Friday, 22 July 2016 at 19:52:59 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
On Friday, 22 July 2016 at 18:30:13 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
Trying to compile code that uses GDC, had to import phobos
files from dmd in to project since they are not in the GDC's
phobo lib(the core.sys.windows stuff).
Almost a
Trying to compile code that uses GDC, had to import phobos files
from dmd in to project since they are not in the GDC's phobo
lib(the core.sys.windows stuff).
Almost all the errors are related to stuff like
PALETTEENTRY* peNew() return { return _peNew.ptr; }
Does that even make sense?
On Friday, 22 July 2016 at 02:08:06 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/21/2016 06:48 PM, Rufus Smith wrote:
> I would like to combine two types
>
>
> template Foo(A, B = 4)
> {
> union
> {
> byte b = B;
> int a = A << 8;
> }
> }
>
> This packs a and b together in to an i
I would like to combine two types
template Foo(A, B = 4)
{
union
{
byte b = B;
int a = A << 8;
}
}
This packs a and b together in to an int bytes, saving an
int(rather than storing a and b in an int each) and makes it
easier to access.
I get an error about overlapp
Does D offer any solutions to generate code dynamically? I would
like to order based on optimal strategies. This requires
effectively hard coding the execution path.
A simple example,
if (x == true)
foo();
else
bar();
can be recoded to be foo() or bar() while x is fixed, in my case
x i
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 at 01:48:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Take a read of this:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/32621854/1457000
The short of it is don't mixin stringof. Instead, mixin the
actual template itself.
The functionLinkage might need to be string, but the types
should remain lite
If it's not clear, I have to import the proper identifiers but
every use of the template would require the user to add their
import. Obviously not the way to go.
I have complex template that uses a mixin to solve some problems.
The mixin produces the error. I thought template's were added in
to the scope of the call? I guess the mixin is inserted before
this happens. That isn't good ;/
Here is one place the error happens
mixin("alias Func = extern("
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 17:10:35 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 17:05:55 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 16:59:48 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 16:50:56 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 16:09:38 UT
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 16:59:48 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 16:50:56 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 16:09:38 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
[...]
But this doesn't create a function with all the attributes of
the original? Just one that h
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 16:58:12 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/19/16 12:52 PM, Rufus Smith wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 15:58:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
[...]
Yes, but then this = null. I matters not for my use case.
'this' is not null in either case. There is no
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 15:58:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/19/16 11:25 AM, Rufus Smith wrote:
[...]
I think what Mike may be alluding to is that there is no name
for the stack frame pointer you can use. There is no 'this'
pointer that you can get at (even though it can be pas
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 16:09:38 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 15:55:02 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
I have some functions that take other functions. I would like
the attributes to be able to "fall" through so I get overload
like behavior. I only care that I am passin
I have some functions that take other functions. I would like the
attributes to be able to "fall" through so I get overload like
behavior. I only care that I am passing a function, not if it is
shared, extern(C), pure, @nogc, etc.
void foo(R, A...)(R function(A) bar)
{
alias type = typeof(b
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 06:46:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 06:32:32 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
Error: 'this' is only defined in non-static member functions,
not __lambda2
Lambda's are delegates and delegates have a "this" type of
pointer. I would like to get at it
I am doing some weird stuff. I duplicate functions and modify
them in a portable way. One problem I have is that I cannot get
data in a relative way to be able to access attached functional
data.
Here is an kinda of thought example,
void base(int a, int b, int c)
{
...
}
This function is
On Monday, 18 July 2016 at 20:15:30 UTC, John wrote:
On Monday, 18 July 2016 at 18:49:22 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
Suppose I have the following: alias func = void function(int);
Is there a way to convert it automatically to something the
same type except of delegate: alias del = toDel(func) = vo
Error: 'this' is only defined in non-static member functions, not
__lambda2
Lambda's are delegates and delegates have a "this" type of
pointer. I would like to get at it inside the lambda to check for
some things. I'm doing some funky stuff. I'm not concerned about
the scope or what this act
On Monday, 18 July 2016 at 18:51:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-07-18 20:49, Rufus Smith wrote:
Suppose I have the following: alias func = void function(int);
Is there a way to convert it automatically to something the
same type
except of delegate: alias del = toDel(func) = void
delega
Suppose I have the following: alias func = void function(int);
Is there a way to convert it automatically to something the same
type except of delegate: alias del = toDel(func) = void
delegate(int);?
Is there any MSB to LSB and vice versa in phobos? Or some tricks
with templates that make it fast as possible?
36 matches
Mail list logo