On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 17:17:49 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 17:10:31 UTC, mw wrote:
BTW, is the .idup must be there?
It is discussed more in the github document but basically the
proposed built-in syntax returns a generic builder thing which
can make more than
On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 18:12:01 UTC, ZK wrote:
I love the extensibility of this, but perhaps there should be
something like `ii"foo".idup` that's syntactic sugar for
`i"foo".idup`. New users might get confused by the need for
appending idup, and then they'll think about how other
