On Sunday, 19 February 2023 at 18:29:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 2/19/23 1:26 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Testing with run.dlang.io, switching between `char` and `int`
changes the ASM output to show whether it's stored or not.
And BTW, you can override this by assigning a zero
On 2/19/23 1:26 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Testing with run.dlang.io, switching between `char` and `int` changes
the ASM output to show whether it's stored or not.
And BTW, you can override this by assigning a zero default:
```d
struct S
{
char[16384] array = 0; // no .init storage
On 2/19/23 1:11 PM, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
If my understanding is correct, the mere fact of having a:
struct S
{
char[16384] array;
}
And then using it anywhere, will necessarily lead to a S.init being
created and linked, leading to a binary size inflation of 16kb.
If my understanding is correct, the mere fact of having a:
struct S
{
char[16384] array;
}
And then using it anywhere, will necessarily lead to a S.init
being created and linked, leading to a binary size inflation of
16kb.
This is not a super high concern, but can inform
