### Re: Modulo that 'wraps' the number?

```On Monday, 21 January 2019 at 18:39:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:

Not a Python user, just hoping to help answer questions :)

Yes I know in fact I'm not the OP but from what I understood from
his post, he want to replicate, but I may be wrong.

If it's the case, this code may help him:

//DMD64 D Compiler 2.072.2
import std.stdio;
import std.math;

int mod(int i,int j){
if(abs(j)==abs(i)||!j||!i||abs(j)==1){return 0;};
auto m = (i%j);
return (!m||sgn(i)==sgn(j))?(m):(m+j);
}

void main(){
int j,i;
for(j=1;j<9;++j){
for(i=1;i<9;++i){
writeln(-i, " % ", +j, " = ", (-i).mod(+j));
writeln(+i, " % ", -j, " = ", (+i).mod(-j));
}
}
}

At least the code above gave me the same results as the Python
version.

Matheus.

```

### Re: Modulo that 'wraps' the number?

```
On 1/21/19 10:54 AM, Matheus wrote:

On Monday, 21 January 2019 at 15:01:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

Probably, this optimizes into better code, but maybe the optimizer
already does this with the expression above:

auto tmp = n % 3;
if(tmp < 0)
tmp += 3;

It's just not a nice single expression.

I don't think you can do this, imagine this case:

auto tmp = -1 % -3; // Note divisor in negative too.

tmp will be "-1" which already matches the Python way, so you can't add
divisor anymore.

If the divisor is unknown, I hadn't considered the case. I was only
considering the case where the divisor is a constant.

In that case, one can probably determine if the divisor is less than 0
before starting.

Not a Python user, just hoping to help answer questions :)

-Steve

```

### Re: Modulo that 'wraps' the number?

```On Monday, 21 January 2019 at 15:01:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:

Probably, this optimizes into better code, but maybe the
optimizer already does this with the expression above:

auto tmp = n % 3;
if(tmp < 0)
tmp += 3;

It's just not a nice single expression.

-Steve

I don't think you can do this, imagine this case:

auto tmp = -1 % -3; // Note divisor in negative too.

tmp will be "-1" which already matches the Python way, so you

Matheus.

```

### Re: Modulo that 'wraps' the number?

```
On 1/21/19 2:33 AM, Paul Backus wrote:

On Monday, 21 January 2019 at 04:52:53 UTC, NaN wrote:

On Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 18:51:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

On 1/20/19 1:28 PM, faissaloo wrote:

In Python -1%3 == 2 however in D -1%3 == -1
Is there a standard library function or something that gives me the
Python version of modulo?

Hm... (n%3+3)%3 should work.

-Steve

You only need the

(n % 3) + 3

You need both:

(-3 % 3) + 3 == 3
((-3 % 3) + 3) % 3 == 0

Probably, this optimizes into better code, but maybe the optimizer
already does this with the expression above:

auto tmp = n % 3;
if(tmp < 0)
tmp += 3;

It's just not a nice single expression.

-Steve

```

### Re: Modulo that 'wraps' the number?

```
On Monday, 21 January 2019 at 04:52:53 UTC, NaN wrote:
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 18:51:54 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:

On 1/20/19 1:28 PM, faissaloo wrote:

In Python -1%3 == 2 however in D -1%3 == -1
Is there a standard library function or something that gives
me the Python version of modulo?

Hm... (n%3+3)%3 should work.

-Steve

You only need the

(n % 3) + 3

You need both:

(-3 % 3) + 3 == 3
((-3 % 3) + 3) % 3 == 0

```

### Re: Modulo that 'wraps' the number?

```On Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 18:51:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:

On 1/20/19 1:28 PM, faissaloo wrote:

In Python -1%3 == 2 however in D -1%3 == -1
Is there a standard library function or something that gives
me the Python version of modulo?

Hm... (n%3+3)%3 should work.

-Steve

You only need the

(n % 3) + 3

```

### Re: Modulo that 'wraps' the number?

```
On 1/20/19 1:28 PM, faissaloo wrote:

In Python -1%3 == 2 however in D -1%3 == -1
Is there a standard library function or something that gives me the
Python version of modulo?

Hm... (n%3+3)%3 should work.

-Steve

```

### Modulo that 'wraps' the number?

```
In Python -1%3 == 2 however in D -1%3 == -1
Is there a standard library function or something that gives me
the Python version of modulo?

```