On Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 17:04:20 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 16:46:43 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Yes I see. I've refined a bit the test case and maybe I'll
took a look this week.
Cool. Is it normal to create a testcase that doesn't depend on
phobos? I suppose it
On Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 16:46:43 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Yes I see. I've refined a bit the test case and maybe I'll took
a look this week.
Cool. Is it normal to create a testcase that doesn't depend on
phobos? I suppose it is needed for it to be included in dmd's
testcases.
On Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 16:05:19 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 13:41:32 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
It looks like a bug, a "reject-valid" one.
Try the same code with
enum A = 0;
and it work, despite of B being still opaque. The problem may
be related to the fact
On Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 13:41:32 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
It looks like a bug, a "reject-valid" one.
Try the same code with
enum A = 0;
and it work, despite of B being still opaque. The problem may
be related to the fact the enum A in the orginal code is opaque
and has not type.
On Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 13:20:12 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
The compiler complains about `cannot form tuple of tuples`
whenever I try to put an AliasSeq in a UDA and try to use it.
You would expect the compiler to expand it. Is this a bug?
---
import std.meta;
enum A; enum B;
On Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 13:41:32 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 10 March 2019 at 13:20:12 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
The compiler complains about `cannot form tuple of tuples`
whenever I try to put an AliasSeq in a UDA and try to use it.
You would expect the compiler to expand it. Is