Re: idiomatic output given -preview=nosharedaccess ,
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:43:00 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote: On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:12:59 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote: On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:04:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :) Yeah... and dip1000. And dip1008. And dip... :) Didn't want to be snippity but, yeah, with "hello world" breaking I thought it was time to fix the standard library. Thanks for the polite confirmation(s). Looking at the stdio.d source it appears that a cast on one line within a template could give nosharedaccess programs access to stdio, stdout, and stderr. A bug/enhancement request was filed.
Re: idiomatic output given -preview=nosharedaccess ,
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:12:59 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote: On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:04:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :) Yeah... and dip1000. And dip1008. And dip... :) Didn't want to be snippity but, yeah, with "hello world" breaking I thought it was time to fix the standard library. Thanks for the polite confirmation(s).
Re: idiomatic output given -preview=nosharedaccess ,
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:04:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :) Yeah... and dip1000. And dip1008. And dip... :)
Re: idiomatic output given -preview=nosharedaccess ,
On 6/30/20 3:56 PM, Bruce Carneal wrote: Given -preview=nosharedaccess on the command line, "hello world" fails to compile (you are referred to core.atomic ...). What is the idiomatic way to get writeln style output from a nosharedaccess program? Is separate compilation the way to go? writeln uses the shared stdout. The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :) -Steve
