On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 01:32:54 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 22:24:34 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I don't want to use lambda.
I don't want create variable.
What is the best way to refer to itself when obtaining
Substring withou using lambda and without create variable?
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 03:47:33 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 22:24:34 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I don't want to use lambda.
I don't want create variable.
What is the best way to refer to itself when obtaining
Substring withou using lambda and without create variable?
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 22:24:34 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I don't want to use lambda.
I don't want create variable.
What is the best way to refer to itself when obtaining
Substring withou using lambda and without create variable?
example:
writeln("Hello Word!"[x.indexOf(" "), $]);
Maybe u
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 01:32:54 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 22:24:34 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I don't want to use lambda.
I don't want create variable.
What is the best way to refer to itself when obtaining
Substring withou using lambda and without create variable?
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 22:24:34 UTC, Marcone wrote:
I don't want to use lambda.
I don't want create variable.
What is the best way to refer to itself when obtaining
Substring withou using lambda and without create variable?
example:
writeln("Hello Word!"[x.indexOf(" "), $]);
no way
I don't want to use lambda.
I don't want create variable.
What is the best way to refer to itself when obtaining Substring
withou using lambda and without create variable?
example:
writeln("Hello Word!"[x.indexOf(" "), $]);