On Sunday, June 2, 2019 1:29:22 PM MDT Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Sunday, June 2, 2019 8:32:16 AM MDT Paul Backus via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 2 June 2019 at 06:59:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > > Almost certainly, hasElaborateCopyConstructor
On Sunday, June 2, 2019 8:32:16 AM MDT Paul Backus via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 June 2019 at 06:59:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Almost certainly, hasElaborateCopyConstructor should be updated
> > to test for both postblit constructors and copy constructors,
> > since its
On Sunday, 2 June 2019 at 14:44:47 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 02:32:16PM +, Paul Backus via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
If std.v2 ever materializes, we'll have an opportunity to fix
papercuts like this. Until then, my preferred workaround is to
use a renaming
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 02:32:16PM +, Paul Backus via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> If std.v2 ever materializes, we'll have an opportunity to fix
> papercuts like this. Until then, my preferred workaround is to use a
> renaming import:
>
> import std.traits: hasNontrivialCopy =
On Sunday, 2 June 2019 at 06:59:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Almost certainly, hasElaborateCopyConstructor should be updated
to test for both postblit constructors and copy constructors,
since its purpose is to test for whether the type has a
user-defined copying function [...] Whether
On Saturday, June 1, 2019 5:29:08 PM MDT SrMordred via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 21:39:33 UTC, SImen Kjærås wrote:
> > On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 21:05:32 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
> >
> > hasElaborateCopyConstructor checks if the type defines a
> > postblit[0].
>
>
On Sunday, 2 June 2019 at 04:02:08 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 23:29:08 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 21:39:33 UTC, SImen Kjærås wrote:
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 21:05:32 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
Haven't tested it extensively, so use at your own
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 23:29:08 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 21:39:33 UTC, SImen Kjærås wrote:
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 21:05:32 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
hasElaborateCopyConstructor checks if the type defines a
postblit[0].
Yes, I know this.
But since dmd 2.086
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 21:39:33 UTC, SImen Kjærås wrote:
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 21:05:32 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
hasElaborateCopyConstructor checks if the type defines a
postblit[0].
Yes, I know this.
But since dmd 2.086 we have copy ctors:
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 at 21:05:32 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
import std.traits;
struct T { this(ref return scope T other){} }
pragma(msg, hasElaborateCopyConstructor!T); //false
hasElaborateCopyConstructor checks if the type defines a
postblit[0]. That is, a function called this(this).
import std.traits;
struct T { this(ref return scope T other){} }
pragma(msg, hasElaborateCopyConstructor!T); //false
11 matches
Mail list logo
