Re: idiomatic output given -preview=nosharedaccess ,

2020-07-01 Thread Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:43:00 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote: On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:12:59 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote: On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:04:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :) Yeah... and dip1000. And

Re: idiomatic output given -preview=nosharedaccess ,

2020-06-30 Thread Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:12:59 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote: On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:04:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :) Yeah... and dip1000. And dip1008. And dip... :) Didn't want to be snippity but, yeah,

Re: idiomatic output given -preview=nosharedaccess ,

2020-06-30 Thread Stanislav Blinov via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:04:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :) Yeah... and dip1000. And dip1008. And dip... :)

Re: idiomatic output given -preview=nosharedaccess ,

2020-06-30 Thread Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
On 6/30/20 3:56 PM, Bruce Carneal wrote: Given -preview=nosharedaccess on the command line, "hello world" fails to compile (you are referred to core.atomic ...). What is the idiomatic way to get writeln style output from a nosharedaccess program? Is separate compilation the way to go?

idiomatic output given -preview=nosharedaccess ,

2020-06-30 Thread Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-learn
Given -preview=nosharedaccess on the command line, "hello world" fails to compile (you are referred to core.atomic ...). What is the idiomatic way to get writeln style output from a nosharedaccess program? Is separate compilation the way to go?