On 2015-08-22 21:14, nims wrote:
I think interfaces are very powerful and I heavily use them. The only
problem I have with them is that serializing/deserializing them to XML
or JSON doesn't seem to work. So far I got to try Orange and
painlessjson. Using Orange all I got was a lot of compiler
On 2015-08-22 21:14, nims wrote:
Using Orange all I got was a lot of compiler errors.
Seems I completely overlooked interfaces. I'll see if I can add support
for them.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 09:26:40 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
On Saturday, 22 August 2015 at 19:14:16 UTC, nims wrote:
Painlessjson indeed does not support interfaces/subclasses at
the moment. There was some discussion about it here:
https://github.com/BlackEdder/painlessjson/issues/8 ,
On Saturday, 22 August 2015 at 19:14:16 UTC, nims wrote:
I think interfaces are very powerful and I heavily use them.
The only problem I have with them is that
serializing/deserializing them to XML or JSON doesn't seem to
work. So far I got to try Orange and painlessjson. Using Orange
all I
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 03:09:03 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Anyway to summise why D doesn't yet have something akin to Java
or C#. Simply put, we generally work with the actual type not
an interface. So libraries like Orange can
serialize/deserialize with great certainty that it got
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 08:38:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
What I was thinking was having a serialize method take an
output range which you will just pass in a value.
I'm not really sure what you mean. Replacing the operator by a
range function or serializing everything automatically?
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 03:25:27 UTC, Kapps wrote:
I've never used Orange, but one thing you could try is casting
your object from MyInterface to Object, and registering the
type Foobar like in
http://dsource.org/projects/orange/wiki/Tutorials/SerializeBase, then serializing/deserializing
On 8/23/2015 10:17 PM, nims wrote:
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 08:38:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
What I was thinking was having a serialize method take an output range
which you will just pass in a value.
I'm not really sure what you mean. Replacing the operator by a range
function or
On 8/23/2015 8:15 PM, nims wrote:
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 03:09:03 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Anyway to summise why D doesn't yet have something akin to Java or C#.
Simply put, we generally work with the actual type not an interface.
So libraries like Orange can serialize/deserialize
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 10:37:11 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 8/23/2015 10:17 PM, nims wrote:
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 08:38:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
What I was thinking was having a serialize method take an
output range
which you will just pass in a value.
I'm not really
I think interfaces are very powerful and I heavily use them. The
only problem I have with them is that serializing/deserializing
them to XML or JSON doesn't seem to work. So far I got to try
Orange and painlessjson. Using Orange all I got was a lot of
compiler errors. Painlessjson did compile
On Saturday, 22 August 2015 at 19:14:16 UTC, nims wrote:
I think interfaces are very powerful and I heavily use them.
The only problem I have with them is that
serializing/deserializing them to XML or JSON doesn't seem to
work. So far I got to try Orange and painlessjson. Using Orange
all I
On 8/23/2015 7:14 AM, nims wrote:
I think interfaces are very powerful and I heavily use them. The only
problem I have with them is that serializing/deserializing them to XML
or JSON doesn't seem to work. So far I got to try Orange and
painlessjson. Using Orange all I got was a lot of compiler
13 matches
Mail list logo
