Re: .d files without a module statement? Required to be absent?
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:55:13PM +, WhatMeWorry via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > > I was poking around the dmd code just to "learn from the best" IMNSHO, Phobos is more representative of typical D code than dmd; dmd code was automatically translated from C++, so a lot of it may still have a lot of C++-isms that wouldn't be in "native" D code. > and I came across some files that ended with the .d extension which > did not have the module statement. (I was under the naive impression > that all .d files must have a module statement) No, if there is no module declaration, the module name will be inferred from the filename. T -- "You know, maybe we don't *need* enemies." "Yeah, best friends are about all I can take." -- Calvin & Hobbes
Re: .d files without a module statement? Required to be absent?
On Saturday, 14 November 2020 at 17:55:13 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote: I was poking around the dmd code just to "learn from the best" and I came across some files that ended with the .d extension which did not have the module statement. (I was under the naive impression that all .d files must have a module statement) If a .d file does not have a module statement, the compiler will infer the name of the module from the path of the file. So, the file `foo/bar.d` will have its module name inferred as `foo.bar`. There is one exception to this: the file `foo/package.d` will have its module name inferred as `foo`, not `foo.package`.
.d files without a module statement? Required to be absent?
I was poking around the dmd code just to "learn from the best" and I came across some files that ended with the .d extension which did not have the module statement. (I was under the naive impression that all .d files must have a module statement) However, in the directory: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/master/samples I can see many examples where this is not the case. Most of them have things like Windows or C structures or calls, etc. In stark difference, there is https://github.com/dlang/dmd/tree/master/src/dmd/backend where all its files seem to have file name = module name strictly enforced. So I guess my question is when is the module statement required? Are they recommended but not essential? Maybe some "Best Practices" notation? the spec sasy "Modules automatically provide a namespace scope for their contents..." so maybe my question becomes, when are namespace scopes required to be present or required to be absent?
