On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 15:03:29 UTC, Dennis wrote:
If you want to exactly match the original C code's semantics, I
suggest translating (unsigned) long with c_long or c_ulong. You
can import them here:
```
import core.stdc.config: c_long, c_ulong;
```
Then you could add this:
```
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:56:35 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:50:47 UTC, NonNull wrote:
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that
the size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same
static assert(long.sizeof == void*.sizeof);
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:56:33 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:50:47 UTC, NonNull wrote:
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that
the size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same, and
I have translated it into very similar D just
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:50:47 UTC, NonNull wrote:
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that the
size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same, and I
have translated it into very similar D just like
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:50:47 UTC, NonNull wrote:
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that the
size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same
static assert(long.sizeof == void*.sizeof);
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:50:47 UTC, NonNull wrote:
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that the
size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same, and I
have translated it into very similar D just like
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that the
size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same, and I have
translated it into very similar D just like
https://dlang.org/blog/2018/06/11/dasbetterc-converting-make-c-to-d/
D has the size of long fixed at 64 bits, so a
