Re: Bug in std.allocator?

2016-10-25 Thread ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-learn

On 10/25/2016 11:30 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:

Please consider the following program:

[...]

I would assume that this program should run forever and never run out of
memory. But instead it triggers an assert inside alocator_list in pass
11. So I assume this is some bug in std.allocator?


I can confirm the crash with 2.071.2. But it doesn't happen with 
2.072.0-b2. So, bug that has already been fixed?



Also whats interresting. The first allocation in each new pass is _not_
the last allocation to be freed. Instead it seems to "leak" one
allocation each pass.

From the output of the program:

229a290fd60 <- same
229a2932570 <- leaked?
pass 11
229a290fd60 <- same


Also looks ok with 2.072.0-b2:

7f448c7ccdb0
7f448c7cd200
pass 99
7f448c7cd200
7f448c7ccdb0



Bug in std.allocator?

2016-10-25 Thread Benjamin Thaut via Digitalmars-d-learn

Please consider the following program:

import std.experimental.allocator.mallocator;
import std.experimental.allocator.building_blocks.allocator_list 
: AllocatorList;

import std.experimental.allocator.building_blocks.free_list;
import std.experimental.allocator;
import std.stdio;

enum uint size = 1104;

alias ScalableFreeList = AllocatorList!((n) =>
ContiguousFreeList!(Mallocator, 0, unbounded)(size * 128, 
size)

);

void main(string[] args)
{
  void[][20] allocs;
  ScalableFreeList allocator;

  for(int i=0; i < 100; i++)
  {
writefln("pass %d", i);
foreach(ref alloc; allocs)
{
  alloc = allocator.allocate(size);
  writefln("%x", alloc.ptr);
}

foreach(alloc; allocs)
{
  allocator.deallocate(alloc);
}
  }
}


I would assume that this program should run forever and never run 
out of memory. But instead it triggers an assert inside 
alocator_list in pass 11. So I assume this is some bug in 
std.allocator?


Also whats interresting. The first allocation in each new pass is 
_not_ the last allocation to be freed. Instead it seems to "leak" 
one allocation each pass.


From the output of the program:

229a290fd60 <- same
229a2932570 <- leaked?
pass 11
229a290fd60 <- same

Or can anyone see a bug in my program?

Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut