On 8/28/17 9:34 PM, Johnson Jones wrote:
produces 4 on both x86 and x64. So, I'm not sure how you are getting 8.
Yes, this is exactly why you should use c_long and c_ulong, because just
using int makes it not portable to other systems.
-Steve
On Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 02:47:34 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
[...]
Seems only long and ulong are issues.
With respect to the currently major platforms you can reasonable
expect software to run on, yes.
Just don't try to use D on something with e.g. 32 bit C shorts
unless you bind to it v
On Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 01:56:43 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 01:34:40 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
[...]
produces 4 on both x86 and x64. So, I'm not sure how you are
getting 8.
There are different 64bit data models [1] and it seems your
platform uses LLP64,
On Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 01:34:40 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
import core.stdc.config;
pragma(msg, c_long.sizeof);
prints 4UL
both on x64 and x86
and and C:
void foo()
{
int dummy;
switch (dummy) {
case sizeof(long) :
case sizeof(long) :
bre
On Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 01:34:40 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
[...]
produces 4 on both x86 and x64. So, I'm not sure how you are
getting 8.
There are different 64bit data models [1] and it seems your
platform uses LLP64, which uses 32bit longs. Am I correct in
assuming you're on Windows
On Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 00:42:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/28/17 7:47 PM, Johnson Jones wrote:
[...]
Then I think possibly the port audio bindings are not correct.
It's also possible that long is not 64-bit even on the platform
you are using. Finally, it's also possible tha
On 8/28/17 7:47 PM, Johnson Jones wrote:
On Monday, 28 August 2017 at 21:35:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 8/27/17 10:17 PM, Johnson Jones wrote:
Looking at the assembly shows something like this:
0041ea98 push 0x0
0041ea9a push 0x0
0041ea9c push 0x0
0041ea9e push dword 0x100
0041e
On Monday, 28 August 2017 at 21:35:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/27/17 10:17 PM, Johnson Jones wrote:
Looking at the assembly shows something like this:
0041ea98 push 0x0
0041ea9a push 0x0
0041ea9c push 0x0
0041ea9e push dword 0x100
0041eaa3 mov ecx, [typeid(PaStreamParameters)+
On Monday, 28 August 2017 at 22:41:56 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Monday, 28 August 2017 at 22:21:18 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
On Monday, 28 August 2017 at 21:35:27 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
[...]
and where are these c_ types defined? The reason I replaced
them was precisely becaus
On Monday, 28 August 2017 at 22:21:18 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
On Monday, 28 August 2017 at 21:35:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/27/17 10:17 PM, Johnson Jones wrote:
[...]
For C/C++ interaction, always use c_... types if they are
available. The idea is both that they will be corre
On Monday, 28 August 2017 at 21:35:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/27/17 10:17 PM, Johnson Jones wrote:
[...]
For C/C++ interaction, always use c_... types if they are
available. The idea is both that they will be correctly defined
for the width, and also it will mangle correctly fo
On 8/27/17 10:17 PM, Johnson Jones wrote:
Looking at the assembly shows something like this:
0041ea98 push 0x0
0041ea9a push 0x0
0041ea9c push 0x0
0041ea9e push dword 0x100
0041eaa3 mov ecx, [typeid(PaStreamParameters)+0xe36fc (0x80d4cc)]
0041eaa9 mov eax, [fs:0x2c]
0041eaaf mov edx, [eax
Looking at the assembly shows something like this:
0041ea98 push 0x0
0041ea9a push 0x0
0041ea9c push 0x0
0041ea9e push dword 0x100
0041eaa3 mov ecx, [typeid(PaStreamParameters)+0xe36fc (0x80d4cc)]
0041eaa9 mov eax, [fs:0x2c]
0041eaaf mov edx, [eax+ecx*4]
0041eab2 push dword [edx+0x1c]
004
Trying to set a callback for portaudio and it's seeing zero for
the value passed.
Pa_OpenStream(&stream, input, output, sampleRate, cast(ulong)0,
cast(PaStreamFlags)(PaStreamFlags.NoFlag +
0*PaStreamFlags.PrimeOutputBuffersUsingStreamCallback),
14 matches
Mail list logo
