On 03/17/2018 11:36 AM, Jonathan wrote:
`(a+b)&0xff` What is this syntax?! Could you give a link to this in the
D documentation?
Here is my description of bitwise AND:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/bit_operations.html#ix_bit_operations.&,%20bitwise%20and
The section titled "Masking" on the
On Saturday, 17 March 2018 at 18:56:55 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
On Saturday, 17 March 2018 at 18:36:35 UTC, Jonathan wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 23:36:14 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 22:12:06 UTC, Soviet Friend
wrote:
I don't care if my
On Saturday, 17 March 2018 at 18:36:35 UTC, Jonathan wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 23:36:14 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 22:12:06 UTC, Soviet Friend
wrote:
I don't care if my computer needs to do math on a 4 byte
basis, I'm not writing assembly.
x86
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 23:36:14 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 22:12:06 UTC, Soviet Friend
wrote:
I don't care if my computer needs to do math on a 4 byte
basis, I'm not writing assembly.
x86 actually doesn't need to do math that way, if you were
writing
I just attempted to add one ubyte to another and store the result
in a ubyte but apparently ubytes get converted to ints when being
added... and converting what becomes an int becomes impossible to
store in a ubyte without an explicit cast...
ubyte a, b;
ubyte c = a + b; // Error: cannot
Soviet Friend píše v Út 19. 01. 2016 v 22:12 +:
> I just attempted to add one ubyte to another and store the result
> in a ubyte but apparently ubytes get converted to ints when being
> added... and converting what becomes an int becomes impossible to
> store in a ubyte without an explicit
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:32:57 +0100, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> Soviet Friend píše v Út 19. 01. 2016 v 22:12 +:
>> I just attempted to add one ubyte to another and store the result in a
>> ubyte but apparently ubytes get converted to ints when being added...
>> and converting what becomes an int
On 01/19/2016 02:12 PM, Soviet Friend wrote:
> ubytes get converted to ints when being added...
It's a common feature involving all integral type in languages like C,
C++, and D:
https://dlang.org/spec/type.html#integer-promotions
> On the topic of complaining about casting... array
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 22:12:06 UTC, Soviet Friend wrote:
I don't care if my computer needs to do math on a 4 byte basis,
I'm not writing assembly.
x86 actually doesn't need to do math that way, if you were
writing assembly, it would just work. This is just an annoying
rule brought
