On 26/08/2010 21:43, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 15:24, Bob Cowdery b...@bobcowdery.plus.com
mailto:b...@bobcowdery.plus.com wrote:
I might be on my way :-) .
Good :) I just skimmed through the thread, so I don't know if you're
still using Code::Blocks.
I'm using
CB doesn't officially have support for D (I don't see it in code completion
either), afaik. But it does have syntax highlighting for it. I have about 30 or
so different languages selectable in the highlighter, I think these came by
default.
Bob Cowdery Wrote:
On 26/08/2010 21:43, Philippe
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:08, Bob Cowdery b...@bobcowdery.plus.com wrote:
***
I'm running 10.05 but when I go to Syntax highlighting there is no 'D' in
the
dropdown. I have C/C++, Squirrel, Windows Resource, XML. To get some
highlighting
I just set the mask for C/C++ to include *.d. On
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 15:24, Bob Cowdery b...@bobcowdery.plus.com wrote:
I might be on my way :-) .
Good :) I just skimmed through the thread, so I don't know if you're still
using Code::Blocks.
I'm using it, and it highlights D code with no problem. For 10.05, it's in
Settings Editor
On 23/08/2010 23:04, bearophile wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic:
I haven't read the specifics of your problem yet, but have you tried using
the newer TDM port of MinGW? The MinGW binaries are still using an older
port of GCC, but the TDM version is much newer, so it might be worth trying
it out.
Bob Cowdery Wrote:
Thanks, that's an honest opinion. The first project I have in mind is a
personal one but it's quite large. My hope would be to move a lot of the
C code into D eventually. I don't think I would risk it on a commercial
project until the toolchain is sorted and its a bit more
On 22/08/2010 22:16, Bob Cowdery wrote:
On 22/08/2010 20:57, bearophile wrote:
Bob Cowdery:
Well, the link still works but the download is 0 bytes so I guess its
not available. Thanks for the thought.
That links works for me :-)
Be happy, bye,
bearophile
Works if I paste it but not
On 23/08/2010 20:24, Bob Cowdery wrote:
On 22/08/2010 22:16, Bob Cowdery wrote:
On 22/08/2010 20:57, bearophile wrote:
Bob Cowdery:
Well, the link still works but the download is 0 bytes so I guess its
not available. Thanks for the thought.
That links works for me :-)
Be happy, bye,
I haven't read the specifics of your problem yet, but have you tried using the
newer TDM port of MinGW? The MinGW binaries are still using an older port of
GCC, but the TDM version is much newer, so it might be worth trying it out.
Get it from here: http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/
Hope that
I like this, and I love the way you install it, this is the way a compiler
has to be installed:
http://nuwen.net/mingw.html
Uhm... The last version (6.6 that is gcc 4.5.1) seems to produce very large
binaries, and the precedent version seems not available. Not good for you.
Bye and sorry,
On 22/08/2010 00:54, div0 wrote:
On 21/08/2010 22:07, Bob Cowdery wrote:
On 20/08/2010 18:44, div0 wrote:
On 20/08/2010 09:17, Bob Cowdery wrote:
I'm still concerned it's a bit too soon as a lot of things seem to be
either Windows or Linux (cmake says its only tested for *nix) but not
On 21/08/2010 22:41, Johannes Pfau wrote:
On 21.08.2010 23:07, Bob Cowdery wrote:
For me at least I'm wondering if it stacks up. Linux support seems
secondary (correct me if I'm wrong). The only painless way to use C
libraries is as dll's and even then the import library must be converted
Bob Cowdery:
Well, the link still works but the download is 0 bytes so I guess its
not available. Thanks for the thought.
That links works for me :-)
Be happy, bye,
bearophile
On 22/08/2010 20:57, bearophile wrote:
Bob Cowdery:
Well, the link still works but the download is 0 bytes so I guess its
not available. Thanks for the thought.
That links works for me :-)
Be happy, bye,
bearophile
Works if I paste it but not straight from the email,odd.
On 20/08/2010 18:44, div0 wrote:
On 20/08/2010 09:17, Bob Cowdery wrote:
I'm still concerned it's a bit too soon as a lot of things seem to be
either Windows or Linux (cmake says its only tested for *nix) but not
both and there is very little guidance on building. I really want to get
this
Bob Cowdery:
Why does a modern language use an old object format I wonder.
This problem will need to be addressed (among others).
The language itself is nice but the
hassle factor for mixed language multi-platform seems quite high. I hope
I'm wrong on both counts.
Despite being in the
On 21/08/2010 22:07, Bob Cowdery wrote:
On 20/08/2010 18:44, div0 wrote:
On 20/08/2010 09:17, Bob Cowdery wrote:
I'm still concerned it's a bit too soon as a lot of things seem to be
either Windows or Linux (cmake says its only tested for *nix) but not
both and there is very little guidance
Thanks for the replies. I've bounced off D a few times because it
didn't seem ready to risk a whole development. I should have mentioned
I'm trying this on Windows 7. I did suspect object formats were
incompatible but as you say would have expected a decent error message.
I also tried from the
On 20/08/2010 06:51, Kagamin wrote:
Bob Cowdery Wrote:
Now I've tried this with just D code and it writes the output and runs
so I know something works. Does anyone know where to look, is it
Code::Blocks, compiler, stupidity (probably).
On windows dmd uses ancient OMF object format, but gcc
A bit more playing and I see that it's assumed that C code is compiled
with dmc and then the D code can be compiled with dmd which will also
link in the obj left by dmc. It wasn't clear at all that to make things
work easily one needs to use both the C and D Digital Mars compilers.
Code::Blocks
On 20/08/2010 09:17, Bob Cowdery wrote:
I'm still concerned it's a bit too soon as a lot of things seem to be
either Windows or Linux (cmake says its only tested for *nix) but not
both and there is very little guidance on building. I really want to get
this working on Windows first. As D makes
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com wrote:
My first question would be whether you used the same linker for both D and C.
On
Linux, they should both be using gcc. On Windows, they should both be using
dmc.
Still, I would have expected a linking error to
Bob Cowdery Wrote:
Now I've tried this with just D code and it writes the output and runs
so I know something works. Does anyone know where to look, is it
Code::Blocks, compiler, stupidity (probably).
On windows dmd uses ancient OMF object format, but gcc compiles to COFF.
23 matches
Mail list logo
