On Monday, 21 February 2022 at 16:58:43 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 21 February 2022 at 15:35:41 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
I'm a bit surprised I've never heard of `adrdox` before now.
yeah i don't advertise much. it is what runs on my dpldocs.info
website though which auto-generates doc
On Monday, 21 February 2022 at 15:35:41 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
I'm a bit surprised I've never heard of `adrdox` before now.
yeah i don't advertise much. it is what runs on my dpldocs.info
website though which auto-generates docs for dub packages.
Regarding ddoc, should I submit a bug report
On Monday, 21 February 2022 at 13:18:01 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
tbh ddoc is pretty bad, you should try my `dub run adrdox`
instead which also creates html but its links actually work.
I gave it a try and I must say that the documentation is
formatted in a very good way, and as you said, all t
tbh ddoc is pretty bad, you should try my `dub run adrdox`
instead which also creates html but its links actually work.
Greetings everyone,
I have a question regarding the use of [relative
links](https://dlang.org/spec/ddoc.html#reference_links) in DDoc.
According to the specification, you can include a reference to an
object that is in scope using square brackets, e.g. `[Object]`.
One of my current projects