On Tuesday, 13 October, 2015 06:11 AM, ric maicle wrote:
Would it be possible to deprecate the old syntax, provide notice to
all D users and make it obsolete after a year?
Please ignore. There is already a DIP filed regarding this matter.
DIP41: dmd/rdmd command line overhaul.
(http://wiki
On Tuesday, 13 October, 2015 05:43 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Perhaps those were introduced after the other ones.
I am agreeing with the other posters that we cannot fix the other ones
because if anyone used = before, it was the part of the path. (Maybe...
Never tried... :) ) So, we cannot change th
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:33 AM, ric maicle via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 October, 2015 01:46 AM, anonymous wrote:
>
>> On Monday 12 October 2015 17:38, ric maicle wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering if this small irregularity should be made consisten
On 10/12/2015 01:03 PM, ric maicle wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 October, 2015 02:39 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
If we accept that = cannot be a part of a file name then we could
support -D=ddocdir as well, but I checked and = can be used as part of a
name at least on Linux. Which may explain why those switc
On Tuesday, 13 October, 2015 02:39 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
If we accept that = cannot be a part of a file name then we could
support -D=ddocdir as well, but I checked and = can be used as part of a
name at least on Linux. Which may explain why those switches are not
consistent with the rest and we
On Monday 12 October 2015 19:46, anonymous wrote:
> and there is point to it
Ugh, should have been: and there is *no* point to it.
On 10/12/2015 11:34 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Monday, 12 October 2015 at 15:38:27 UTC, ric maicle wrote:
-Dddocdir
-Dffilename
-odobjdir
-offilename
I'm wondering if this small irregularity should be made consistent or
maybe I misunderstood something.
Yeah, it is a bit confusing and shou
On Tuesday, 13 October, 2015 01:46 AM, anonymous wrote:
On Monday 12 October 2015 17:38, ric maicle wrote:
I'm wondering if this small irregularity should be made consistent or
maybe I misunderstood something.
As far as I know, the difference just happened, and there is point to it.
The style
On Monday, 12 October 2015 at 15:38:27 UTC, ric maicle wrote:
I'm relearning D. I'm using the reference compiler (DMD) and I
am a bit confused with how the compiler 'switches' are supposed
to be used.
I find some 'switches' that require an equal (=) symbol when a
value is required to be passe
On Monday 12 October 2015 17:38, ric maicle wrote:
> I'm wondering if this small irregularity should be made consistent or
> maybe I misunderstood something.
As far as I know, the difference just happened, and there is point to it.
The style without "=" is older and wasn't followed when new swi
I'm relearning D. I'm using the reference compiler (DMD) and I am a bit
confused with how the compiler 'switches' are supposed to be used.
I find some 'switches' that require an equal (=) symbol when a value is
required to be passed in.
-boundscheck=[on|safeonly|off]
-color[=on|off]
-conf=pat
11 matches
Mail list logo