A horrible alternative would be to use `alias` on `size_t` to
make up a new pseudo-type that is more aligned with the code
logic.
```
alias integer = size_t;
import std.stdio : writefln;
void main() {
auto arr = [
[5, 15], // 20
[2, 3, 2, 3], // 10
[3, 6, 2, 9]
Well all these proposals to `int` index like `size_t` and `const
typeof(arr.length)` are cryptic and less readable and less
straightforward in comparison to how it used to be. Feels like
horrible decision if the language is suppose to be somewhat
futureproof. The `int` was simple, straighforwar
On Friday, 3 May 2024 at 15:19:13 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Friday, 3 May 2024 at 14:59:57 UTC, BoQsc wrote:
On Friday, 3 May 2024 at 13:18:02 UTC, user1234 wrote:
[...]
So how would you update this example, what is the right index
type here to choose?
```
import std.stdio : writefln;
vo
On Friday, 3 May 2024 at 14:59:57 UTC, BoQsc wrote:
On Friday, 3 May 2024 at 13:18:02 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Friday, 3 May 2024 at 10:50:03 UTC, BoQsc wrote:
[...]
**You can specify the index type, just choose the right one.**
For now there's a deprecation message but after some while
you'
On Friday, 3 May 2024 at 13:18:02 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Friday, 3 May 2024 at 10:50:03 UTC, BoQsc wrote:
Why am I forced to visit this D Lang thread, why this
deprecation warning still appears in my console window in the
latest version of DMD. Does not make any sense from the
developer's per
On Friday, 3 May 2024 at 10:50:03 UTC, BoQsc wrote:
Why am I forced to visit this D Lang thread, why this
deprecation warning still appears in my console window in the
latest version of DMD. Does not make any sense from the
developer's perspective to show this warning and pollute the
already p
Why am I forced to visit this D Lang thread, why this deprecation
warning still appears in my console window in the latest version
of DMD. Does not make any sense from the developer's perspective
to show this warning and pollute the already polluted logging
entries of the compiler. How am I sup
On Friday, January 18, 2019 8:34:22 AM MST Michael via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 13:29:29 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 12:27:17 UTC, Michael wrote:
> >> This, to be, looks like quite the explicit conversion, no?
> >
> > Yeah, I agree.
On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 13:29:29 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 12:27:17 UTC, Michael wrote:
This, to be, looks like quite the explicit conversion, no?
Yeah, I agree. But the language is silly. I just leave the type
out of foreach and explicitly cast it inside t
On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 12:27:17 UTC, Michael wrote:
This, to be, looks like quite the explicit conversion, no?
Yeah, I agree. But the language is silly. I just leave the type
out of foreach and explicitly cast it inside the body.
On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 12:27:17 UTC, Michael wrote:
Hello all,
I am getting this deprecation warning when compiling using
DMD64 D Compiler v2.084.0 on Linux. I'm a little unsure what
the problem is, however, because the code producing these
warnings tends to be of the form:
foreach
On 1/18/19 7:27 AM, Michael wrote:
Hello all,
I am getting this deprecation warning when compiling using DMD64 D
Compiler v2.084.0 on Linux. I'm a little unsure what the problem is,
however, because the code producing these warnings tends to be of the form:
foreach (int i, ref prop; props)
Hello all,
I am getting this deprecation warning when compiling using DMD64
D Compiler v2.084.0 on Linux. I'm a little unsure what the
problem is, however, because the code producing these warnings
tends to be of the form:
foreach (int i, ref prop; props)
This, to be, looks like quite the
13 matches
Mail list logo
