On Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 15:09:48 UTC, bauss wrote:
Why is it not allowed to have empty UDAs for classes?
Let's say we have an UDA like this:
struct Exclude { }
Then we want to put it on a class like:
@Exclude class Foo
{
...
}
This will fail with the following error:
Error: type
On Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 21:24:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, October 26, 2017 15:09:48 bauss via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
It worked just fine when I just tried it on my machine - both
with dmd master and with 2.076.1. Are you using an older
version of the
On Thursday, October 26, 2017 15:09:48 bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Why is it not allowed to have empty UDAs for classes?
>
> Let's say we have an UDA like this:
> struct Exclude { }
>
> Then we want to put it on a class like:
>
> @Exclude class Foo
> {
> ...
> }
>
> This will fail
Why is it not allowed to have empty UDAs for classes?
Let's say we have an UDA like this:
struct Exclude { }
Then we want to put it on a class like:
@Exclude class Foo
{
...
}
This will fail with the following error:
Error: type Exclude has no value
But on everything else we can place an
