On Friday, 22 December 2017 at 00:18:40 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Friday, 22 December 2017 at 00:12:45 UTC, Vino wrote:
On Thursday, 21 December 2017 at 06:31:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
[...]
Hi Ali,
Thank you very much, the pull request is in open state, so can
you please let me know when can we
On Friday, 22 December 2017 at 00:12:45 UTC, Vino wrote:
On Thursday, 21 December 2017 at 06:31:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
On 12/19/2017 02:32 AM, Vino wrote:
> even though it is a simple code copy+paste
The change was a little more complicated than my naive
adaptation from std.algorithm.fold
On Thursday, 21 December 2017 at 06:31:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/19/2017 02:32 AM, Vino wrote:
> even though it is a simple code copy+paste
The change was a little more complicated than my naive
adaptation from std.algorithm.fold. Here is the pull request:
https://github.com/dlang/p
On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 22:31 -0800, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 02:32 AM, Vino wrote:
>
> > even though it is a simple code copy+paste
>
> The change was a little more complicated than my naive adaptation
> from
> std.algorithm.fold. Here is the pull request:
>
>
On 12/19/2017 02:32 AM, Vino wrote:
> even though it is a simple code copy+paste
The change was a little more complicated than my naive adaptation from
std.algorithm.fold. Here is the pull request:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5951
Ali
On Monday, 18 December 2017 at 20:53:28 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Ali,
Shouldn't this be a pull request for std.parallelism to be
extended?
If the function is in std.algorithm, then people should not
have to write it for themselves in std.parallelism.
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 11:01 -0800, Al
Ali,
Shouldn't this be a pull request for std.parallelism to be extended?
If the function is in std.algorithm, then people should not have to
write it for themselves in std.parallelism.
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 11:01 -0800, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
>
[…]
> > Hi Ali,
> >
> >
On 12/18/2017 02:18 AM, Vino wrote:
On Sunday, 17 December 2017 at 20:00:53 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/17/2017 08:11 AM, Vino wrote:
> As per the document form std.parallelism it states that we
can use
> taskPool.reduce so can we use the same for fold
(taskPool.fold) as
> basically both ar
On Sunday, 17 December 2017 at 20:00:53 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/17/2017 08:11 AM, Vino wrote:
> As per the document form std.parallelism it states that we
can use
> taskPool.reduce so can we use the same for fold
(taskPool.fold) as
> basically both are same with slight variation on seed
On 12/17/2017 08:11 AM, Vino wrote:
> As per the document form std.parallelism it states that we can use
> taskPool.reduce so can we use the same for fold (taskPool.fold) as
> basically both are same with slight variation on seed values, if
> possible can can we define the same in the below lin
HI All,
As per the document form std.parallelism it states that we can
use taskPool.reduce so can we use the same for fold
(taskPool.fold) as basically both are same with slight variation
on seed values, if possible can can we define the same in the
below lines
Tried the below but getting
11 matches
Mail list logo