Re: In D, lexically, which are the chars that can follow $, exactly ?
On Sunday, 13 March 2016 at 14:55:36 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote: On Sunday, 13 March 2016 at 14:07:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote: '$' is only valid in an indexExpression (https://dlang.org/spec/grammar.html#IndexExpression), so it can only be followed by - ' ' - ']' - operators , usually '-' but also '/', '+', '>>' etc Is that right ? I'd like to relax the lexical rule for C.E static macros which currently is - "^\$\w*[a-zA-Z]$", so for example "$a1A" is valid and "$a1" is not. But it looks like for example "$)" or "$}" wouldn't be ambiguous since it's not possible in D. I don't know what C.E is, but `$` is an expansion of `PrimaryExpression`, which means it can (syntactically) appear anywhere a `PrimaryExpression` is allowed. For example, this compiles: void main() { int[] a; a[0 .. ($)] = 0; } Then the C.E macros syntax can't be enhanced. At least the current is not ambiguous. The thing is that a macro is substitued automatically/dynamically so the requirement is that nothing that's syntaxically valid in D must replacable.
Re: In D, lexically, which are the chars that can follow $, exactly ?
On Sunday, 13 March 2016 at 14:07:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote: '$' is only valid in an indexExpression (https://dlang.org/spec/grammar.html#IndexExpression), so it can only be followed by - ' ' - ']' - operators , usually '-' but also '/', '+', '>>' etc Is that right ? I'd like to relax the lexical rule for C.E static macros which currently is - "^\$\w*[a-zA-Z]$", so for example "$a1A" is valid and "$a1" is not. But it looks like for example "$)" or "$}" wouldn't be ambiguous since it's not possible in D. I don't know what C.E is, but `$` is an expansion of `PrimaryExpression`, which means it can (syntactically) appear anywhere a `PrimaryExpression` is allowed. For example, this compiles: void main() { int[] a; a[0 .. ($)] = 0; }
In D, lexically, which are the chars that can follow $, exactly ?
'$' is only valid in an indexExpression (https://dlang.org/spec/grammar.html#IndexExpression), so it can only be followed by - ' ' - ']' - operators , usually '-' but also '/', '+', '>>' etc Is that right ? I'd like to relax the lexical rule for C.E static macros which currently is - "^\$\w*[a-zA-Z]$", so for example "$a1A" is valid and "$a1" is not. But it looks like for example "$)" or "$}" wouldn't be ambiguous since it's not possible in D.