Java wildcards... in D
Hi. I'm trying to parse an simple string expression to something like Element array. Each Element can have a value of unknown type, which will be further combined and calculated to let say real/double/float value, no mather. In Java i had something like generics and this could be implemented like: class Element { T value; Element(T value){ this.value=value; } } class Parser{ Collectionparse(String expression){ Collection retVal = new ArrayList<>(); //"expression" would be parser but for this example lets say we just create new elements Element e1= new Element<>(); e1.value=3; Element e2 = new Element<>(); e2.value="+" retValue.add(e1); retValue.add(e2); ... return retValue; } } And then in other class not connected through module or template parameter or anything i could call it just: Parser p = new Parser(); Collection elements=p.parse("(1+2+3)/6"); and then check weather (element.value instanceof Operator) or other stuff. if i do something like this in D: module calculator; class Element(T) { T value; this(T value){ this.value=value; } } and then: Element[] parse(string expression){ Element[] returnSlice; ... //"expression" would be parser but for this example lets say we just create new elements Element!(int) e1 = new Element(); e1.value=3; Element!(string) e2= new Element(); e2.value="+"; returnSlice~=e1; returnSlice~=e2; return returnSlice; } I'm getting error: class calculator.Element used as a type. How to represent this class template parameter T of Element(T) as wildcard Element(?) ?? Cheers Voitech
Re: Java wildcards... in D
On 01/18/2016 02:08 PM, Voitech wrote: > alias Element =Algebraic!(real,string); > > i will get: > > Cannot store a int in a VariantN!(16LU, real, string) Are you really storing a 'real' or a 'string'? (The default floating type in D is double, not real.) The following compiles and works as expected with dmd v2.069.2: import std.variant; void main() { alias Element =Algebraic!(real,string); auto r = Element(1.2L); auto s = Element("hello"); } Ali
Re: Java wildcards... in D
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 21:15:51 UTC, Chris Wright wrote: On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:19:22 +, Voitech wrote: Hi. I'm trying to parse an simple string expression to something like Element array. Each Element can have a value of unknown type, which will be further combined and calculated to let say real/double/float value, no mather. In Java, Element is always Element behind the scenes, and there's only one type. In D, Element(T) is a template that produces a type. Element!int and Element!Object are entirely different and, thanks to what templates allow you to do, the compiler can't assume any relationship between the two. You have to establish that relationship manually by creating a base type: abstract class BaseElement { } class Element(T) : BaseElement { T value; } Alternatively, if this is not appropriate to your usecase, you may want to look at std.variant, which explicitly implements value boxing. Thank you for answering. I think i will use std.variant.Algebraic implementation for my needs. But about Algebraic... why first template parameter of it must be always int. Let say i want to store only real and string in Algebraic no int. if i try to do something like : alias Element =Algebraic!(real,string); i will get: Cannot store a int in a VariantN!(16LU, real, string) if i declare as: alias Element =Algebraic!(int,real,string); this will be ok. But anything other than Algebraic!(int,x,y,z...) doesn't compile, like: alias Element =Algebraic!(uint,bool,string); //compilation error alias Element =Algebraic!(ulong,Object,bool); //compilation error alias Element =Algebraic!(long,real,string); //compilation error Why is that ? Cheers Voitech.
Re: Java wildcards... in D
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:19:22 +, Voitech wrote: > Hi. I'm trying to parse an simple string expression to something like > Element array. Each Element can have a value of unknown type, which will > be further combined and calculated to let say real/double/float value, > no mather. In Java, Element is always Element behind the scenes, and there's only one type. In D, Element(T) is a template that produces a type. Element!int and Element!Object are entirely different and, thanks to what templates allow you to do, the compiler can't assume any relationship between the two. You have to establish that relationship manually by creating a base type: abstract class BaseElement { } class Element(T) : BaseElement { T value; } Alternatively, if this is not appropriate to your usecase, you may want to look at std.variant, which explicitly implements value boxing.