On Thursday, 10 May 2012 at 07:32:42 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Can you explain me how TemplateThisParameter works? I read in
the
manual but a more detail explanation would help me a lot.
Hmm, I have thought following code should work about foo, but
doesn't.
import std.stdio;
struct Proxy
{
struct S
{
void f() {}
void f() const{}
void f() immutable {}
void f() shared {}
void f() shared const {}
}
struct Proxy(T)
{
T o;
I'm new to the concept of shared const. What is the difference when
comparing to immutable?
On 05/11/2012 11:51 AM, sclytrack wrote:
struct S
{
void f() {}
void f() const{}
void f() immutable {}
void f() shared {}
void f() shared const {}
}
struct Proxy(T)
{
T o;
I'm new to the concept of shared const. What is the difference when
comparing to immutable?
And to answer myself.
import std.stdio;
void test1(shared const float [] p)
{
writeln(works);
}
Nope, shared const still doesn't make sense to me.
In the above example the p values can still change
at any time.
Why does shared const even exist?
On Fri, 11 May 2012 08:05:33 -0400, sclytrack sclytr...@iq87.fr wrote:
import std.stdio;
void test1(shared const float [] p)
{
writeln(works);
}
Nope, shared const still doesn't make sense to me.
In the above example the p values can still change
at any time.
Why does shared const even
On 05/11/2012 08:56 AM, Kenji Hara wrote:
The spec:
http://dlang.org/template#TemplateThisParameter
doesn't talk about typeof(this).
I think current behavior is less useful than I have thought.
What would the current behavior be useful for?
And, current std.typecons.Proxy doesn't work as
Can you explain me how TemplateThisParameter works? I read in the
manual but a more detail explanation would help me a lot.
Looks like it infers the declaring type's modifiers.
On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 04:49:39 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 22:58:07 UTC, Namespace wrote:
In my development of the Ref / NotNull structure, I came
across a
problem: All the methods of Proxy aren't inout. Has this a
reason or will change? In my opinion they should all
On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 06:42:09 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 04:49:39 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 22:58:07 UTC, Namespace wrote:
In my development of the Ref / NotNull structure, I came
across a
problem: All the methods of Proxy aren't inout. Has
In my development of the Ref / NotNull structure, I came across a
problem: All the methods of Proxy aren't inout. Has this a
reason or will change? In my opinion they should all be inout.
I mentioned previous self fixes in my corresponding Ref /
NotNull thread already.
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 22:58:07 UTC, Namespace wrote:
In my development of the Ref / NotNull structure, I came across
a
problem: All the methods of Proxy aren't inout. Has this a
reason or will change? In my opinion they should all be inout.
I mentioned previous self fixes in my
12 matches
Mail list logo
