Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On Wednesday, 3 June 2020 at 10:11:59 UTC, realhet wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 20:38:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/2/20 10:51 AM, realhet wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 13:10:55 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:28:01 UTC, realhet wrote:
mixin("int[", 2, "]") a = mixin([5]) ~ 6;
That's insane :D
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 20:38:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/2/20 10:51 AM, realhet wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 13:10:55 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:28:01 UTC, realhet wrote:
A month ago I discovered that mixinDeclarations can be used for
types too:
mixin("int[", 2, "]") a = [5, 6];
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On 6/2/20 10:51 AM, realhet wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 13:10:55 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:28:01 UTC, realhet wrote:
mixin("@property auto ", k, "() const { return ", v, "; }");
Wow, string mixin can process comma separated list, I gotta remember
this, thanks!
Indeed, I too did not know about this!
I generally do a ~ b ~ c, not worrying about performance since it's
compile time, but this requires that you do the conversion to string
yourself. In some cases, it's a requirement since what the compiler does
to convert to a string may not be what you want.
But something like mixin("int a = ", adefault, ";"); is much better than
import std.format;
mixin(format("int a = %s;" adefault));
I will have to remember this. I recently found out that pragma(msg) has
the same capability.
-Steve
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 13:37:25 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:28:01 UTC, realhet wrote:
Try UDAs instead of a map:
struct A {
struct G {
@("hauteur") int height;
}
Good idea, thx! I already using UDA's for range and measurement
units.
struct Profile{ @STORED:
@UNIT("mm") @RANGE(0, 100) float radius = 21;
I gonna need one more reasonably named UDA struct.
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 13:10:55 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:28:01 UTC, realhet wrote:
mixin("@property auto ", k, "() const { return ", v, "; }");
Wow, string mixin can process comma separated list, I gotta
remember this, thanks!
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:28:01 UTC, realhet wrote:
I did it that way:
private enum fieldMap = [ // simple names for descriptive and
structured fields
"hauteur" : "general.height",
"rayon" : "profile.radius",
"plage" : "profile.plage",
"offsetv" : "profile.verticalOffset",
"offseth" : "profile.horizontalOffset",
"varrad0" : "profile.linearVariationBottom",
"varrad1" : "profile.linearVariationTop",
"amplitude" : "periphery.amplitude",
"varlin0" : "periphery.linearVariationBottom",
"varlin1" : "periphery.linearVariationTop",
"varsinp" : "periphery.cosinusVariationPlage",
"varsino" : "periphery.cosinusVariationOffset",
"periodes" : "periphery.nbPeriods",
"revolution": "periphery.turn"
];
static foreach(k, v; fieldMap){ mixin("@property auto $()
const{ return #; }".replace("$", k).replace("#", v)); } //I
know, i know -> AliasSeq :D
But it doesn't look nice.
Try UDAs instead of a map:
struct A {
struct G {
@("hauteur") int height;
}
struct P {
@("rayon") int radius;
@("plage") int plage;
@("offsetv") int verticalOffset;
@("offseth") int horizontalOffset;
int noShortcut;
@("varrad0") int linearVariationBottom;
}
G general;
P profile;
/* ... */
static foreach (i, m; typeof(this).tupleof)
static foreach (j, f; typeof(m).tupleof)
static if (__traits(getAttributes, f).length)
mixin("@property auto ", __traits(getAttributes,
f)[0], "() const { return this.tupleof[i].tupleof[j]; }");
}
pragma(msg, __traits(allMembers, A));
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:28:01 UTC, realhet wrote:
static foreach(k, v; fieldMap){ mixin("@property auto $()
const{ return #; }".replace("$", k).replace("#", v)); } //I
know, i know -> AliasSeq :D
You can use std.format.format to do it in one function call:
mixin("@property auto %s() const { return %s; }".format(k,
v));
Or just put `k` and `v` directly into the mixin:
mixin("@property auto ", k, "() const { return ", v, "; }");
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:28:01 UTC, realhet wrote: On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:10:03 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 6/2/20 1:56 AM, realhet wrote: Oh and I can put that function generator mixin thing into a template as well, that way it is reusable and much nicer. There are a lot of possibilities in D, I love it!
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:10:03 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 6/2/20 1:56 AM, realhet wrote:
> struct A{
>struct B{ int c; }
>B b;
>
>auto f(){
> alias d = b.c;
The spec explicitly says it's not legal: "Aliases cannot be
used for expressions" (Item 10):
https://dlang.org/spec/declaration.html#alias
I use nested functions for such cases:
auto f(){
auto d() {
return b.c;
}
return d;
}
Ali
Thanks for responses:
I did it that way:
private enum fieldMap = [ // simple names for descriptive and
structured fields
"hauteur" : "general.height",
"rayon" : "profile.radius",
"plage" : "profile.plage",
"offsetv" : "profile.verticalOffset",
"offseth" : "profile.horizontalOffset",
"varrad0" : "profile.linearVariationBottom",
"varrad1" : "profile.linearVariationTop",
"amplitude" : "periphery.amplitude",
"varlin0" : "periphery.linearVariationBottom",
"varlin1" : "periphery.linearVariationTop",
"varsinp" : "periphery.cosinusVariationPlage",
"varsino" : "periphery.cosinusVariationOffset",
"periodes" : "periphery.nbPeriods",
"revolution": "periphery.turn"
];
static foreach(k, v; fieldMap){ mixin("@property auto $()
const{ return #; }".replace("$", k).replace("#", v)); } //I know,
i know -> AliasSeq :D
But it doesn't look nice.
I've found some additional info here:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/hresorfqicczofnrc...@forum.dlang.org?page=2
Seems like I must not except the same from an alias template
paramater and from the alias construct. The alias construct is
for a single symbol.
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On 6/2/20 1:56 AM, realhet wrote:
> struct A{
>struct B{ int c; }
>B b;
>
>auto f(){
> alias d = b.c;
The spec explicitly says it's not legal: "Aliases cannot be used for
expressions" (Item 10):
https://dlang.org/spec/declaration.html#alias
I use nested functions for such cases:
auto f(){
auto d() {
return b.c;
}
return d;
}
Ali
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 09:07:08 UTC, Basile B. wrote: On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 08:56:13 UTC, realhet wrote: [...] There's a language rule, expressions cant be aliased, however D has a bug, some expressions that look like type can be aliased, then when you use them you have an error about 'this' but in first place here you should really have an error saying 'cant alias expression'. Note that most of the time attempts to alias expressions is detected. This is a particular bug, a "corner case".
Re: Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 at 08:56:13 UTC, realhet wrote:
Hello,
I have a 2 level nested struct structure with nice descriptive
field names.
And I thought it will be easy to alias those identifierLists
with a few letter names and do some calculations on them.
But I'm having an error.
struct A{
struct B{ int c; }
B b;
auto f(){
alias d = b.c;
return d; //Compiler Error: need 'this' for c of type int.
}
}
There's the this and it's called "b."
Why is this? If I copy paste the aliased expression "b.c", it
compiled fine.
Thanks in advance!
There's a language rule, expressions cant be aliased, however D
has a bug, some expressions
that look like type can be aliased, then when you use them you
have an error about 'this' but in first place here you should
really have an error saying 'cant alias expression'.
Making alias of a struct field needs "this".
Hello,
I have a 2 level nested struct structure with nice descriptive
field names.
And I thought it will be easy to alias those identifierLists with
a few letter names and do some calculations on them.
But I'm having an error.
struct A{
struct B{ int c; }
B b;
auto f(){
alias d = b.c;
return d; //Compiler Error: need 'this' for c of type int.
}
}
There's the this and it's called "b."
Why is this? If I copy paste the aliased expression "b.c", it
compiled fine.
Thanks in advance!
