On Sunday, October 23, 2016 19:20:43 e-y-e via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On this topic, do you think a 'cumulativeSum' specialisation
> based on the 'sum' specialisation be welcome in phobos? Here's a
> quick prototype, obviously not library standard but the basic
> logic is there:
> https://gis
On Sunday, 23 October 2016 at 10:19:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, October 23, 2016 10:10:40 e-y-e via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
...
Per
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.071.0.html
2.071.0 came out at the beginning of April, and 2.072 has been
slow in coming, so we've only had poin
On Sunday, October 23, 2016 10:10:40 e-y-e via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 October 2016 at 09:11:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 23, 2016 07:46:19 e-y-e via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> ...
> >
> > It's not a bug. It's just too new. You looked at
On Sunday, 23 October 2016 at 09:11:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, October 23, 2016 07:46:19 e-y-e via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
...
It's not a bug. It's just too new. You looked at the master
branch on github, whereas what you're probably using on your
computer is 2.071.2, whic
On Sunday, October 23, 2016 07:46:19 e-y-e via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Recently I needed to use a cumulative sum function, so I looked
> in phobos' documentation for 'cumulative' but found nothing
> useful. Then I looked in the forums for it and found nothing
> useful. But when I searched phob
Recently I needed to use a cumulative sum function, so I looked
in phobos' documentation for 'cumulative' but found nothing
useful. Then I looked in the forums for it and found nothing
useful. But when I searched phobos for it I found cumulativeFold
in std.algorithm.iteration:
https://github.c
