On Friday, 18 September 2015 at 00:55:12 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Thursday 17 September 2015 23:27, jmh530 wrote:
I think I could figure out how to look through the arguments
for a bool, but wouldn't that make me give up the default
value for the bool?
If you don't find a bool, you use the d
On Thursday 17 September 2015 23:27, jmh530 wrote:
> I think I could figure out how to look through the arguments for
> a bool, but wouldn't that make me give up the default value for
> the bool?
If you don't find a bool, you use the default value.
On Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 21:27:31 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
There's probably a way to clean this up better, but this is what
I was talking about.
import std.algorithm : sum;
import std.stdio : writeln;
import std.traits : isNumeric;
auto test(T)(T x, bool sample=true)
{
auto sum_
On Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 18:40:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
I would actually just make it required or do separate functions
with it. Optional and variadics don't mix well together.
(You could also loop through and look for a bool argument
yourself but that is a bit messier.)
It'
On Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 18:40:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
import std.meta;
import std.traits;
if(allSatisfy!(isNumeric, V))
should do it
Was not aware of allSatisfy. Thanks.
On Thursday, 17 September 2015 at 17:35:18 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I noticed that there's some interesting interplay with this
technique and default arguments.
Yeah, it expects the V... to consume the rest of the arguments so
it doesn't really leave any room for the default arg.
I would actually
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 20:26:56 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Thanks to you both. This works perfect.
I noticed that there's some interesting interplay with this
technique and default arguments.
From below, it is required that you put the ones with default
arguments last. If there are only tw
Thanks to you both. This works perfect.
On Monday 14 September 2015 21:59, jmh530 wrote:
> This approach gives the correct result, but dmd won't deduce the
> type of the template. So for instance, the second to the last
> line of the unit test requires explicitly stating the types. I
> may as well use the alternate version that doesn
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 19:59:18 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
In R, it is easy to have some optional inputs labeled as ...
and then pass all those optional inputs in to another function.
I was trying to get something similar to work in a templated D
function, but I couldn't quite get the same beh
In R, it is easy to have some optional inputs labeled as ... and
then pass all those optional inputs in to another function. I was
trying to get something similar to work in a templated D
function, but I couldn't quite get the same behavior. What I have
below is what I was able to get working.
11 matches
Mail list logo
